The High Court dismissed an S.B. Civil First Appeal for noncompliance due to unremoved defects, specifically non-deposit of court fees, after multiple opportunities were granted.
The appeal is dismissed in non-compliance and non-prosecution. Stay petition and all pending applications are disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JD:34002]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 502/2016
Supyari Devi Wife Of Shri Ramdev Jat, R/o Village Rohisada, Tehsil Degana, District- Nagaur.
----Appellant
Versus
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : None present
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA Order
09/10/2023
(2 of 2)
[2023:RJ-JD:34002]
[CFA-502/2016]
defects are not removed within the stipulated period, the appeal would be listed for dismissal before the Court.
(REKHA BORANA),J
77-T.Singh/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a civil appeal should be allowed to proceed when defects in court fees are not removed within the time granted.
Supyari Devi
Hameer Ram
Meera Devi
Mahesh Devi
Ramdev
Sukha Ram
Rekha Borana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
