This high court order on 14/12/2023 disposed of a civil revision petition as abated because the sole petitioner, Norang Ram, had died. The trial court record was ordered to be returned forthwith.
Revision petition disposed of as abated; record of trial court sent back forthwith.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JD:43765]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 91/2012
Norang Ram
----Petitioner
Versus
Kamal Kumar And Ors
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. K.R. Saharan For Respondent(s) : Mr. SG Ojha Mr. Deepak Nehra
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN GOPAL VYAS
Order
14/12/2023
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the sole petitioner - Norang Ram has died, therefore, this civil revision petition stands abated.
In view of the above submission, the instant revision petition is disposed of as abated.
Record of the trial Court be sent back forthwith.
(MADAN GOPAL VYAS),J
66-Bharti/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the civil revision petition stands abated due to the death of the sole petitioner.
Norang Ram
Kamal Kumar And Ors
Madan Gopal Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
