Suman v. Pooja Devi
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal against rejection of interim application under Order XXXIX CPC. Court quashed impugned order which relied only on discrepancies in Khata numbers between documents, remanding for fresh decision as that ground was deemed untenable.
What did the court decide?
Impugned order quashed; matter remanded for fresh decision on interim application.
What the court decided
[2023/RJJD/017555]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 808/2023
Suman adopted D/o Brajlal, Aged About 29 Years, W/o Sumesh, Resident of 02, N.P. at present Dabla, Tehsil Raisinghnagar District Sri Ganganagar.
----Appellant
Versus
Pooja Devi W/o Manish Bishnoi, Aged About 26 Years, Resident of 05 N.P. (Dabla), Tehsil Raisinghnagar District Sri Ganganagar.
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. B.S. Sandhu For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mahaveer Bishnoi
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA
Order
26/05/2023
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the rejection of an interim injunction application based solely on differing Khata numbers in a Will and Sale Deed is tenable.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Suman adopted D/o Brajlal
- respondent
Pooja Devi W/o Manish Bishnoi
Coram
Rekha Borana
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- CMA/808/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court