Suman v. Sumitra
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal against order rejecting injunction application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC with Section 151 CPC is allowed. Order quashed due to rejection on illogical ground of differing Khata numbers; matter remanded for fresh decision.
What did the court decide?
Order impugned quashed and set aside; matter remanded for fresh decision on injunction application. Stay petition disposed of.
What the court decided
[2023/RJJD/017554]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 807/2023
Suman adopted D/o Brajlal, Aged About 29 Years, W/o Sumesh, Resident of 02 N.P. At Present Dabla, Tehsil Raisinghnagar, District Sri Ganganagar.
----Appellant
Versus
Sumitra W/o Hansraj, Aged About 67 Years, Resident of 05 N.P. (Dabla), Tehsil Raisinghnagar, District Sri Ganganagar.
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. B.S. Sandhu For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mahaveer Bishnoi
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA
Order
26/05/2023
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Suman adopted D/o Brajlal, Aged About 29 Years, W/o Sumesh
- respondent
Sumitra W/o Hansraj, Aged About 67 Years
Coram
Rekha Borana
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- CMA/807/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court