Dismissed
Rakma v. Gatulal and Ors.
Rajasthan HCCMA/656/2001
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Appeal dismissed in default due to non-appearance of the appellant. No substantial decision on merits.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was dismissed in default.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
[2023/RJJD/016423]
¶2
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JODHPUR
¶3
S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 656/2001
¶4
Rakma
¶5
----Appellant
¶6
Versus
¶7
Gatulal & Ors
¶8
----Respondents
¶9
| For Appellant(s) | : Nonepresent. |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Jagdish Vyas(Insurance Co.) |
¶10
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA PRAKASH SONI
¶11
Order
¶12
19/05/2023
¶13
- There is no representation for the appellant when the matter is called.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Rakma
- respondent
Gatulal
Coram
AI extract
Rajendra Prakash Soni
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- CMA/656/2001
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court