This order notes that the appellant raised against the acquittal of the accused requires a Division Bench, directing the office to treat the Single Bench appeal as a Division Bench appeal.
Directed to treat S.B. Criminal Appeal as D.B. Criminal Appeal for listing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 1335/2022
Jasu Kanwar
----Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan
----Respondent
For Appellant : Mr. Sohil Khan For Respondent No.1 : Mr. B.R. Bishnoi, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA PRAKASH SONI
Order
05/07/2023
This criminal appeal has been filed on behalf of the appellant against the acquittal of respondent No.2 for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC, therefore, the office is directed to treat this ‘S.B. Criminal Appeal’ as ‘D.B. Criminal Appeal’ and thereafter list appropriately.
(RAJENDRA PRAKASH SONI),J
(VIJAY BISHNOI),J
Abhishek Kumar S.No.28
Jasu Kanwar
State Of Rajasthan
VIJAY BISHNOI
RAJENDRA PRAKASH SONI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
