In this civil miscellaneous appeal, the appellant did not press the matter and only sought liberty to raise grounds before the lower court. The High Court dismissed the appeal as not pressed.
Liberty granted to appellants to raise grounds before the lower court regarding the pending application under Section 7 of the Guardianship and Wards Act.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JD:22902-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
D.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 1050/2023
Versus
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Dilip Singh Rathore
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT Judgment
24/07/2023
After attempting to argue the matter for quite some time, learned counsel for the appellants, on instructions, has submitted that he does not want to press the instant miscellaneous appeal, however, seeks liberty for the appellants to raise all available grounds before the Court where the application under Section 7 of the Guardianship and Wards Act, filed on behalf of the appellants, is pending consideration.
Hence, the instant civil miscellaneous appeal is dismissed as not pressed with liberty sought for.
(YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT),J
(VIJAY BISHNOI),J
1-AjaySingh/-
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ratna Ram
Bhanwri
Resident of Village Jinrasar
Durga
VIJAY BISHNOI
YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
