The High Court of Rajasthan permitted the substitution of new appellants upon a registered gift deed and granted leave to withdraw the appeal following a settlement between parties.
Granting of application under Order 22 Rule 10 CPC for substitution of appellants and permission to withdraw the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JD:19578]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 144/2010
Assignee of the rights of the appellant Mishri Lal-
----Appellant
Versus
Smt. Chanchal Devi W/o Shri Prakash Chandra Sancheti, Resident of Gali No.5, Paota C Road, Jodhpur, Rajasthan.
----Respondent
| For Appellant(s) | : Mr. |
HR Soni |
|---|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. |
Rajendra Prasad |
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA
Order
04/07/2023
[2023:RJ-JD:19578]
[CFA-144/2010]
(2 of 2)
substitution, permission may be granted to withdraw the present appeal.
The registered gift deed dated 12.12.2018 has been annexed with the application, a perusal of which shows that the plot, whose wall was in dispute in the suit, has been gifted to the present applicants by the appellant Mishri Lal.
(REKHA BORANA),J
47-KashishS/-
3 issues framed by the court
Whether a substitution of appellants can be permitted upon submission of a registered gift deed and settlement.
Whether permission can be granted to withdraw the present appeal after a compromise is entered.
Whether the amended cause title stands taken on record after substitution.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Assignee of the rights of the appellant Vikas Sankhla
Aakash Sankhla
Counsel for the appellant
Smt. Chanchal Devi
Rekha Borana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
