Partly allowed
Ajay Kumar v. State and Ors.
Rajasthan HCCFA/298/2018
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Appeal against revenue dispute was dismissed as infructuous because the parties settled the dispute under the amnesty scheme. Pending applications also dismissed.
What did the court decide?
Present appeal and stay petition and all pending applications dismissed.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
[2023:RJ-JD:19367]
¶2
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
¶3
S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 298/2018
¶4
Ajay Kumar S/o Shri Raj Kumar, By Caste Khatri, Resident Of 3/47, Housing Board, Sri Ganganagar.
¶5
----Appellant
¶6
Versus
¶7
- State Of Rajasthan Through Collector, Sri Ganganagar. 2. Zila Udhyog Kendre Through General Manager, Opposite Police Line, Sri Ganganagar.
¶8
- Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Padampur Through Administration.
¶9
- Tehsildar Revenue, Sri Ganganagar.
¶10
- Tehsildar Revenue, Padampur. 6. Firm Ajay Traders, Padampur Through Partner Raj Kumar S/o Shri Anant Ram Khatri, Resident Of 385-386, A-Block, Sri Ganganagar.
¶11
- Raj Kumar Chaddha S/o Shri Anant Ram, By Caste Khatri, Resident Of 385-386, A-Block, Sri Ganganagar.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Ajay Kumar
- respondent
State Of Rajasthan Through Collector, Sri Ganganagar
- respondent
Zila Udhyog Kendre
- respondent
Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Padampur
- respondent
Tehsildar Revenue, Sri Ganganagar
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CFA/298/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court