Allowed

Ramkunwar Son of Shri Misrilal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC8 Apr 2022SOSR/107/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court suspended the sentence awarded to the accused-applicant and allowed the application for bail, requiring a personal bond and two sureties to be furnished to the trial court. The order was made without commenting on the merits of the case.

What did the court decide?

Sentence suspended during pendency; accused released on bail subject to furnishing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- and two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each.

Ramkunwar Son of Shri Misrilal Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence Application

¶3

No.107/2022

¶4

¶5

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1456/2021

¶6

Ramkunwar Son of Shri Misrilal, Resident Of Napakhera Police Station Sawar District Ajmer Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Ajmer)

¶7

----Accused-Petitioner

¶8

Versus

¶9

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.

¶10

----Respondent

¶11

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Liyakat Ali, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.K. Sheoran, P.P.

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶13

Order

¶14

08/04/2022

¶15

Heard learned counsel for the parties on the application filed for suspension of sentence and perused the entire material available on record.

¶16

Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the accused-applicant was on bail during trial as well as during pendency of the appeal and presently he is behind bars. Learned counsel further submits that final hearing of the petition is likely to take time thus sentence of the accused-applicant may be suspended.

¶17

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer regarding suspension of sentence.

¶18

(2 of 2)

¶19

[SOSR-107/2022]

¶20

I have considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties.

¶21

Without commenting upon the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to suspend the sentence awarded to the applicant.

¶22

Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence awarded by the learned trial Court and affirmed by the learned appellate Court against the accused-applicant namely, Ramkunwar S/o Shri Misrilal in Criminal Regular Case No.304/2010 (130/09, 98/07) shall remain suspended during pendency of the petition and he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- along with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before this court on 9^th May, 2022 and thereafter as and when called upon to do so.

¶23

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶24

DANISH USMANI /15

Ramkunwar Son of Shri Misrilal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramkunwar Son of Shri Misrilal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramkhiladi S/O Shri Nanagram Vs State of Rajasthan

Siyaram Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Naresh S/O Moolyaram Vs State of Rajasthan

State of Raj. Vs Bablu @ Nitish and Ors.

Mahendra Kumar Vs Bablu and Ors.

Ranglal S/O Gangaram Vs State of Rajasthan