Dismissed
Naresh S/O Moolyaram v. State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan HCCRLR/342/2022
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR…
What the court decided
AI extract
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 342/2022
Naresh S/o Moolyaram, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Nangalsherpur, Present Police Station Balghat, District Karauli (Raj)
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manoj Avasthi. For : Mr. Ganesh Saini, PP Respondent(s) Mr. Rajesh Kumar Parashar.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Order
07/04/2022
v/khuLFk fopkj.k U;k;ky; U;kf;d eftLVªsV] VksMkHkhe] ftyk djkSyh }kjk izdj.k la[;k &293@2007 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukafdr 20-12-19] ftlds rgr v;kph@ifjoknh dh vksj ls izLrqr ifjokn ij ;kph@vfHk;qDr dks /kkjk 138 ijdzkE; fy[kr vf/kfu;e esa nks"kh djkj nsrs gq, ,d o"kZ ds lk/kkj.k dkjkokl ,oa 80]000@& :i;s dk vFkZn.M vf/kjksfir dj nf.Mr fd;k x;k] vne vnk;xh vFkZn.M ,d ekg ds vfrfjDr lk/kkj.k dkjkokl ls nf.Mr fd;k x;k] ds fo:) izLrqr nkf.Md vihy la[;k &08@2020 v/khuLFk vihyh;
(2 of 2)
[CRLR-342/2022]
U;k;ky;] vij ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k] dze&1] fg.MkSu flVh }kjk fu.kZ; fnukad 07-3-22 ls [kkfjt dh xbZ] ls O;fFkr gksdj ;kph@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk izLrqr dh xbZ gSA
cgl lquh xbZA ;ksX; vf/koDrk ;kph dk dFku jgk fd i{kksa ds e/; jkthukek gks pqdk gS rFkk ifjoknh dks ;kph }kjk jkthukek vuqlkj jkf'k vnk dj nh xbZ gS ,oa bl dze esa fyf[kr esa jkthukek i=koyh ij izLrqr gSA mDr jkthukek ds vk/kkj ij izdj.k dk fuLrkj.k fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh xbZA
nksuksa i{kksa us jkthukek LosPN;k ls gksuk Lohdkj fd;k] jkthukek i=koyh ij miyC/k gS rFkk jftLVªkj U;kf;d }kjk mls rLnhd fd;k x;k gS] vijk/k {keuh; gS] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa mijksDr jkthukes ds vk/kkj ij ;kph@vfHk;qDRk dks /kkjk 138 ,u-vkbZ-,DV ds vijk/k ls nks"keqDr fd;k tkuk lehphu gSA
ifj.kker% ;kph dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk jkthukek ds vk/kkj ij Lohdkj dh tkrh gS ,oa v/khuLFk fopkj.k U;k;ky;] U;kf;d eftLVªsV] VksMkHkhe ftyk djkSyh }kjk izdj.k la[;k &293@2007 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukafdr 2012-2019 ,oa nkf.Md vihy la[;k &08@2020 esa v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky;] vij ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k] dze&1] fg.MkSu flVh }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 07-3-22 vikLr fd;k tkrk gS rFkk ;kph&vfHk;qDr dks /kkjk 138 ijdzkE; fy[kr vf/kfu;e ds vkjksi ls c:, jkthukek nks"keqDr fd;k tkrk gSA
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
Murari/28
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the impugned summons/quashing order under Section 293 CrPC should be set aside based on arbitration.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Naresh
State Of Rajasthan
Shimbhbhu Dayal
Uma Shanker Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court