High Court disposed of the writ petition relying on a prior judgment in Bhawna Lohar, allowing pending applications and aligning the disposal terms with that earlier decision.
Writ petition disposed in terms of Bhawna Lohar; pending applications disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1222/2022
Bharat Kumar S/o Shri Sohanlal, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Sadari, Tehsil Desuri, District Pali.
----Petitioner
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. |
Dashrath Singh |
|---|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. |
K.S. Rajpurohit,AAG |
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA
Order
22/08/2022
Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the issue in question is covered by the judgment passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1535/2022; Bhawna Lohar v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. , decided on 24.05.2022.
In Bhawna Lohar’s case (supra), it was held as under:-
(2 of 2)
[CW-1222/2022]
“Consequently, the petitions filed by the petitioners are allowed. The action of the respondents in deciding the issue without affording any opportunity of hearing to the petitioners, is set aside. The respondents would now disclose the material to the petitioners and on the petitioners making a representation in this regard, they would decide the eligibility of the petitioners / the validity of the certificate issued to them and based on their decision, would proceed further in the matter.
The Director (Non-Gazetted) would disclose the material within a period of 15 days to the petitioners, response / representation, if any, be made by the petitioners within a period of two weeks thereafter to the Director (Non-Gazetted) and he would pass appropriate orders on the same within a period of four weeks thereafter.
The petitioners would be free to take appropriate proceedings, in case, they have any grievance qua the decision taken by the respondents in this regard.
The respondents shall not conclude the recruitment before passing of the final orders as indicated hereinbefore.
Insofar as, the issue sought to be raised by the respondents based on the notification dated 9.12.2021 is concerned, the said issue is kept open.”
Learned counsel for the petitioner is also in agreement to the aforesaid submission.
In view of the submission made, the present writ petition is also disposed of in terms of Bhawna Lohar’s case (supra).
All the pending applications also stand disposed of.
(REKHA BORANA),J
195-Sachin/-
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Bhawna Lohar v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.Followed¶19
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1535/2022; Bhawna Lohar v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.
Bharat Kumar
State of Rajasthan
Rekha Borana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
