In this single-line order, the High Court of Rajasthan dismissed the writ petition. The court held that the petitioner had an alternative remedy before the Departmental Authorities and no party appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2844/2022
Surbhi Anand W/o Rahul Anand, Aged About 45 Years, R/o A- Krishna Nagar, Kota, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH Order
17/11/2022
None present on behalf of the petitioner, even in the second round.
By this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 27.04.2021 passed by the Rajasthan Excise Department.
In my considered view, the petitioner is having the alternative remedy before the Departmental Authorities with regard to his grievance raised in the present writ petition.
In that view of the matter, the present writ petition stands dismissed.
(INDERJEET SINGH),J
Upendra Pratap Singh /64
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be dismissed as the petitioner has an alternative remedy.
Surbhi Anand W/o Rahul Anand
The State Of Rajasthan, Through Joint Secretary, Finance (Excise) Department, Government Of Rajasthan
The Rajasthan Excise Department, Through Excise Commissioner, Udaipur
The District Excise Officer, Bara
The District Excise Officer, Kota
Inderjeet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
