The High Court dismissed the second appeal as infructuous because the impugned order had been re-decided on merits by the trial court, rendering the appeal without substance.
Second appeal dismissed as infructuous; pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 115/2019
Suwa Lal Rajora S/o Shri Shankar Lal Rajora, Aged About 69 Years, R/o Gram Bada Baas Gram Kotkhawada Tehsil Chaksu District Jaipur
----Appellant
Versus
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Gaurav Sharma Saraswat For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order
15/07/2022
(2 of 2)
[CSA-115/2019]
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
NITIN /37
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the second appeal has become infructuous due to the remand order being re-decided on merits by the trial court.
Suwa Lal Rajora
Smt. Suja Devi
Mukesh Kumar
Sudeesh Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
