This Court disposed of a first appeal in a suit for specific performance based on a settlement reached by parties in the spirit of Lok Adalat. The impugned decree was set aside, and the court fee paid in the appeal was refunded.
Impugned judgment and decree set aside; court fee paid in first appeal refunded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 307/2015
Puraram s/o Shri Mahadev Jat, R/o Village Sargoth, Tehsil Srimadhopur, District Sikar.
----Appellant-defendant
Versus
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : Mr. N.K. Maloo Sr. Adv. with Mr. Vishnu Bohra For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.R. Saini
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order
15/07/2022
(2 of 2)
[CFA-307/2015]
performance and are agreed to set aside the impugned judgment and decree dated 28.05.2015.
at Madras Vs. M.C. Subramaniam & Ors. [(2021) 3 SCC 560] .
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
NITIN /110
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should dispose of a first appeal in specific performance upon a post-judgment settlement reached in the spirit of Lok Adalat.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
High Court of Judicature at Madras Vs. M.C. Subramaniam & Ors.Referred¶24
High Court of Judicature at Madras Vs. M.C. Subramaniam & Ors. [(2021) 3 SCC 560] · Who else cites this
Puraram s/o Shri Mahadev Jat
Shri Gopi Chand s/o Shri Mangalram
Shri Vijay Kumar S/o Shri Mhorilal Mali
Land Holder through Tehsildar, Srimadhopur
Sub-registrar, Srimadhopur
SUDESH BANSAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
