This order dismisses the S.B. Civil Revision Petition as infructuous because the main suit, which was pending before the trial court, had been finally disposed of, making the challenge to the interlocutory order no longer tenable.
The revision petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 96/2018
----Petitioners
Versus
(2 of 2)
[CR-96/2018]
----Respondents
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order
15/07/2022
Learned counsel for petitioners submits that the main suit, which was pending before the trial court itself, has finally disposed of, hence the instant revision petition, arising out of the interlocutory order dated 17.02.2018, has become infructuous.
In view of above, the revision petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
All pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of.
(SUDESH BANSAL), J
SACHIN /42
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the civil revision petition is maintainable or has become infructuous due to the disposal of the main suit.
Rameshwar Prasad Vijayvargaya (Through Legal Representatives)
Rajesh Kumar Soni
Deepak Soni
Govind Soni
Santowsh @ Shanit Devi
Tulsiram Soni
SUDESH BANSAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
