Balveer v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court held that the FIR is not fit for quashing as the Investigating Officer proved the encashment of an unsigned cheque by the petitioner-manager.
What did the court decide?
FIRs not quashed; bail executed in trial; liberty to raise issues during trial.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 888/2021
Balveer S/o Gopi Ram, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Near Holika Chowk, Kasba Nohar, Hanumangarh.
----Petitioner
Versus
- State, Through Pp
- Rohitash S/o Sh. Sultan Singh, R/o Durjana, Nohar, Dist. Hanumangarh.
----Respondents
Connected With
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 673/2021
Balveer S/o Gopi Ram, Aged About 46 Years, B/c Jat, R/o Near Holika Chowk, Kasba Nohar, Hanumangarh.
----Petitioner
Versus
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the FIR be quashed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. in a cheque dispute.
Whether an unsigned cheque can be encashed without the Manager's connivance.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Balveer S/o Gopi Ram
- respondent
State
- respondent
Rohitash S/o Sh. Sultan Singh
- respondent
Kamla W/o Brij Lal
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMP/888/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court