Allowed

Dilip Choudhary v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC2 Nov 2022CRLMP/81/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment disposes of criminal miscellaneous petitions under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of an FIR for affray and assault. The court allowed the petitions subject to the petitioners filing requisite bail bonds in the trial court upon charge-sheet filing, with liberty to raise issues at an appropriate stage.

What did the court decide?

Petitions allowed with liberty to submit bail bonds in trial court upon charge-sheet filing and liberty to raise issues at appropriate stage.

Dilip Choudhary Vs State of Rajasthan — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 81/2019

¶3

Dilip Choudhary S/o Bihari Lal Choudhary, Aged About 38 Years, Badi Sadri , P.s. Badi Sadri , Distt. Chittorgarh

¶4

Nijameddin S/o Abdul Gani, Aged About 35 Years, Badi Sadri , P.s. Badi Sadri , Distt. Chittorgarh

¶5

Bihari Lal Choudhary S/o Tarachand Ji, Aged About 65 Years, Badi Sadri , P.s. Badi Sadri , Distt. Chittorgarh

¶6

Ravi S/o Mohan Lal Harijan, Aged About 25 Years, Badi Sadri , P.s. Badi Sadri , Distt. Chittorgarh

¶7

Durga Singh Menaria S/o Satyanarayan Ji, Aged About 30 Years, Badi Sadri , P.s. Badi Sadri , Distt. Chittorgarh

¶8

Hemant Bangad S/o Kamalkant Bangad, Aged About 34 Years, Badi Sadri , P.s. Badi Sadri , Distt. Chittorgarh

¶9

Dilip Suthar S/o Govind Suthar, Aged About 38 Years, Badi Sadri , P.s. Badi Sadri , Distt. Chittorgarh

¶10

Rajendra Singh Ranawat S/o Lal Singh, Aged About 25 Years, Badi Sadri , P.s. Badi Sadri , Distt. Chittorgarh

¶11

Sampat Kumar Prajapat S/o Ramchandra, Aged About 34 Years, Badi Sadri , P.s. Badi Sadri , Distt. Chittorgarh

¶12

Bharat Suthar S/o Kailash Suthar, Aged About 25 Years, Badi Sadri , P.s. Badi Sadri , Distt. Chittorgarh

¶13

Shairf Mohd S/o Umar Mohd, Aged About 34 Years, Badi Sadri , P.s. Badi Sadri , Distt. Chittorgarh

¶14

----Petitioners

¶15

Versus

¶16

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp 2. Ramkumar Tada S/o Bhanwaru Ram Tada, Ajmer , Presently Posted As Tehsildar , Tehsil Office Badi , Sadri Distt. Chittorgarh

¶17

----Respondents

¶18

Connected With

¶19

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 82/2019

¶20

Raghuveer Singh Jhala S/o Harnath Singh, Aged About 36 Years, Badi Sadri , P.s. Badi Sadri , Distt. Chittorgarh

----Petitioner

(2 of 3)

[CRLMP-81/2019]

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶26

Ramkumar Tada S/o Bhanwaru Ram Tada, Ajmer , Presently Posted As Tehsildar , Tehsil Office Badi Sadri , Distt. Chittorgarh

¶27

----Respondents

¶28

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sudhir Saruparia Mr. Kalpataru Tripathi for Mr. Vipul Dharnia For Respondent(s) : Mr. Arun Kumar, PP Mr. Pradeep Shah

¶29

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

¶30

Order

¶31

02/11/2022

¶32

These criminal misc. petitions under Section 482 Cr.P.C. have been preferred for quashing of FIR No.001/2019 registered at Police Station Badi Sadri, District Chittorgarh for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 452, 332, 353 of IPC and Section 3 of PDPP Act.

¶33

Learned Public Prosecutor submits that the investigation is compete and prima-facie the offence has been found to be made out against the petitioners.

¶34

Learned Public Prosecutor submits that there is no requirement of arrest of the petitioners.

¶35

The factual report produced by learned Public Prosecutor is taken on record.

¶36

In the peculiar factual matrix, the present petitions are disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to submit their requisite bail bonds before the learned trial Court at the time of filing of the charge-sheet and the date of filing of the charge-sheet shall be

¶37

(3 of 3) [CRLMP-81/2019]

¶38

informed by the investigating officer to the petitioners; in case they fail to do so, the learned trial court shall be free to proceed strictly in accordance with law. Further, the petitioners shall also have a liberty to take up all their issues before the learned trial Court at appropriate stage.

¶39

All pending applications also stand disposed of.

¶40

(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.

¶41

46-47-Sudheer/-

Dilip Choudhary v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dilip Choudhary v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bachittar Singh Vs State

Narayan Singh Vs Sanjay Jain

Manoj Vs State of Rajasthan

Madho Singh Vs State

Praveen Vs State of Rajasthan

Raghuveer Singh Jhala Vs State of Rajasthan