Allowed

Harjindra Singh v. State

Rajasthan HC5 Aug 2022CRLMP/569/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the criminal miscellaneous petition by discharging the petitioners of various IPC offences. The Court invoked Section 482 Cr.P.C. relying on the Supreme Court decision in Gian Singh v/s State of Punjab and an accepted compromise between the parties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners discharged of offences under Sections 467, 468, 471, 193 & 120-B IPC; Stay petition disposed of.

Harjindra Singh Vs State — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 569/2019

¶3

Harjindra Singh S/o Jangeer Singh Tarkhan, Aged About 36 Years, Sriganganagar

¶4

Prithviraj S/o Mamraj, Aged About 60 Years, Sriganganagar

¶5

Moman Ram S/o Mamraj, Aged About 75 Years, Sriganganagar

¶6

Pappi Devi Spouse/o Rugha Ram, Aged About 45 Years, D/o Mamraj All R/o Ganeshgarh, Teh And Dist Sriganganagar

¶7

----Petitioners

¶8

Versus

¶9

State, Through Pp

¶10

Sahab Aram S/o Arjan Puri Goswami, Chak 4 Bpm (Bhopalpura) Teh Suratgarh, Dist Sriganganagar

¶11

----Respondents

¶12

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Saurabh Soni For Respondent(s) : Mr. Arun Kumar, PP Mr. Kunal Sancheti

¶13

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

¶14

Order

¶15

05/08/2022

¶16

It is stated at the Bar that a compromise has been arrived at between the parties. It is borne out that the complainant is not inclined to proceed further in the matter.

¶17

Learned counsel for the parties have placed reliance on a decision of Supreme Court in case of Gian Singh V/s. State of Punjab & Anr. [(2012) 10 SCC 303] .

¶18

It is also submitted that upon the aforementioned compromise, the learned court below vide order dated 10.02.2018

¶19

(2 of 2)

¶20

[CRLMP-569/2019]

¶21

has accepted the compromise in relation to the offence under Sections 420 IPC.

¶22

In view of the compromise arrived at between the parties as well as the aforesaid order dated 10.02.2018 of the learned court below and applying the ratio in decision of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. (supra) , this Court deems it just and proper to invoke its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

¶23

Accordingly, the present misc. petition is allowed and the petitioners are discharged of the offences under Sections 467, 468, 471, 193 & 120-B IPC as well, in relation to Criminal Regular Case No.87/2016 pending before learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sadulshahar, District Sri Ganganagar.

¶24

Stay petition stands disposed of.

¶25

(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.

¶26

46-Zeeshan

Harjindra Singh v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Harjindra Singh v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anita Vs State of Rajasthan

Lrs of Krishan Lal Wadhwa Vs State of Raj

Devendra Sankhla Vs Parbat Singh

Darshan Singh Vs State and Anr.

Jagmalaram Vs State of Rajasthan

Lalit Halwal Vs State