The High Court dismissed the S.B. Criminal Appeal as having abated because the accused-appellant had expired, disposing of all pending applications.
The appeal was dismissed as abated and all pending applications were disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 5/2001
Krishanl Lal Wadhwa through legal representatives:
----Appellants
Versus
State of Rajasthan.
----Respondent
| For Appellant(s) | : Mr. Dharmendra Surana for Mr. Himmat Jagga |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Arun Kumar,PP |
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
04/08/2022
At the outset, learned Public Prosecutor submits that the accused-appellant has expired on 29.05.2021, which is reflected from the factual report furnished by learned Public Prosecutor.
The factual report is taken on record.
On such submission, the present appeal is dismissed as having abated. All pending applications stand disposed of. Record of the learned trial court be sent back forthwith.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.
42-Zeeshan
Krishan Lal Wadhwa through legal representatives
State of Rajasthan
Dr. Puspendra Singh Bhati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
