The petitioner sought withdrawal of a criminal miscellaneous petition. The court dismissed the main petition and the stay application as withdrawn upon counsel's submission that objections should be raised in trial court.
Criminal Misc. Petition No. 516/2019 and Stay Application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 516/2019
Satish Kumar S/o Budhram Meghwal, Aged About 38 Years, W.no.23, Suratgarh, Dist Sriganganagar.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Lokesh Mathur (through VC) For Respondent(s) : Mr. B.R. Bishnoi, AGC
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA
Order
01/02/2022
A perusal of the record of the trial court reveals that the evidence has commenced in the trial court.
Learned counsel Shri Mathur submits that the petitioner would be better advised to raise all his objections before the trial court at the appreciate stage of proceedings. With this liberty, he seeks to withdraw the instant criminal misc. petition, which is dismissed as such. Stay application is also dismissed as withdrawn.
(SANDEEP MEHTA),J
58-Sudhir Asopa/-
Satish Kumar
State Of Rajasthan
Tulsi Devi
Sandeep Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
