Dismissed

Kundan Mal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC14 Mar 2022CRLMP/2009/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A criminal miscellaneous petition under Section 482 CrPC for quashment of an FIR was disposed of by directing the petitioner to join the investigation and allowing the IO to issue a notice if a cognizable offence is made out against him.

What did the court decide?

Directing the petitioner to join the investigation and allowing the IO to issue a notice under Section 41-A CrPC if a cognizable offence is made out.

Kundan Mal Vs State of Rajasthan — Writ and Judicial Review | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

¶2

JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 2009/2020

¶4

Kundan Mal S/o Shri Mool Chand, Aged About 62 Years, B/c Regar , R/o Ward No 33, Sujangarh , Distt. Churu

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

Niyamat Ali Pathan S/o Shri Mohammed Pathan, B/c Musalman , R/o Near Sain Temple , Bada Bas, Ladnu , Distt. Nagaur

¶9

----Respondents

¶10

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. S. L. Jain
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi,P. P.

¶11

JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

¶12

Order

¶13

14/03/2022

¶14

The present petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code has been filed by the petitioner for quashment of FIR No.225/2019 dated 09.09.2019, vide which allegations under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120-B of the Indian Penal code, have been levelled against the petitioner.

¶15

Having regard to the allegations made in the FIR, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the petitioner to join the investigation.

¶16

The petitioner may file a representation before the Investigating Officer, who shall consider the same in accordance with law.

¶17

In case the Investigating Officer comes to the conclusion that a cognizable offence is made out against the petitioner, he

¶18

(2 of 2)

¶19

[CRLMP-2002/2020]

¶20

shall issue a notice to the petitioner as required under Section 41-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶21

The criminal misc. petition so also stay petition stands disposed of accordingly.

¶22

Needless to observe that the petitioner’s remedy for taking appropriate action shall stand reserved.

¶23

(DINESH MEHTA),J

¶24

6-A.Arora/-

Kundan Mal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kundan Mal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jaitun Vs Habib Ahmed

Sharda Vs Prabharam @ Parbaram Prajapat

U.I.Ins.Co.Ltd. Vs Rajmata Smt.Neera Kumari and Ors.

Dharmendra Kumar Choudhary Vs State of Rajasthan

Uma Pareek Vs Motiram

Ghevar Chand Bhati Vs State of Rajasthan