Bail application allowed. Court noted petitioner was arrested for offences under IPC and POCSO Act. Found petitioner fit for bail despite allegations of instigation in the death of a death.
Accused petitioner enlarge on bail by furnishing bond Rs. 50,000/- and two sureties Rs. 25,000/- each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 750/2022
Gaurav S/o Ramkalyan, R/o Regar Basti Karmoda Ps Mantown Distt. Sawaimadhopur (At Present Confined Distt. Jail Sawaimadhopur)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through The PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tarun Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. MS Saini, PP Mr. Girish Khandelwal
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI Order
17/05/2022
(2 of 2)
[CRLMB-750/2022]
(FARJAND ALI),J
SAHIL SONI /09
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the accused petitioner is entitled to bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in a case involving offences under IPC Sections 376, 366A, 363, 354D and POCSO Act.
Whether the loss of life of the deceased Arti provides sufficient grounds to deny bail to the accused petitioner.
10 provisions across 3 enactments
Gaurav S/o Ramkalyan
State Of Rajasthan, Through The PP
Farjand Ali
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
