Allowed

Govind Agarwal S/O Moti Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC17 May 2022CRLMB/336/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court ordered grant of anticipatory bail to petitioner Govind Agarwal in an SI case regarding offences under IPC Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B on furnishing personal and surety bonds as per standard conditions.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted on personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each; specific conditions imposed for interim release.

Govind Agarwal S/O Moti Lal Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 336/2022

¶3

Govind Agarwal S/o Moti Lal, Aged About 57 Years, R/o Vill. Sumerganjmandi Ps Indragarh Bundi

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dipti Agarwal. For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.S. Saini, PP. Mr. J.S. Chauhan.

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI

¶10

Order

¶11

17/05/2022

¶12

The present bail application has been filed by the petitioner Govind Agarwal S/o Moti Lal under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No. 265/2020 registered at Police Station Indragarh, Bundi for the offence(s) under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it is a case of civil nature where custodial interrogation would not be required.

¶14

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

¶15

Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the petitioner and taking into account the totality of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail application.

¶16

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-336/2022]

¶17

Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Civil Indragarh, Bundi in F.I.R. No. 265/2020 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:-

¶18

(i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶19

(ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and

¶20

(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.

¶21

(FARJAND ALI),J

¶22

PREETI VALECHA /121

Govind Agarwal S/O Moti Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Govind Agarwal S/O Moti Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pappulal @ Ramprasad Son of Shri Mangilal Vs State of Rajasthan

Mahendra Singh S/O Shri Fatehsingh Vs State of Rajasthan

Shakuntala W/O Late Banji Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Gaurav S/O Ramkalyan Vs State of Rajasthan

Vikash @ Vicky S/O Kishan Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramkishan Bhadana Son of Tulsiram Gujar Vs State of Rajasthan