Allowed

Teekamchand S/O Shivajilal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC17 May 2022CRLMB/6802/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this bail application, the High Court of Rajasthan, Jaipur Bench, considered the petitioner's request for release on bail. The court examined injury reports and prior bail history before granting bail.

What did the court decide?

Bail allowed with a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- and two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each, providing security to the satisfaction of the forwarding officer on all judges' appearing before the court on d

Teekamchand S/O Shivajilal Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIOH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAM BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Znd Bail Application No. 6802/2022

¶3

~eekamchand S/o Shivajilal, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Kotda, P.s. Ghad, Dist. Tonk (Raj.) (At Present Lodge At Dist. Jail, Tonk)

¶4

Versus

¶5

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.

¶6

LC 1.- I, l.3 e 7% 1 ..I '4.5 F ? -: i 8 ;T :? ,r)-. -5 , ----Respondent
*., b" a .--f ,, r ..
. .
For etitioner(s) .- _ , - . : Mr. Ashindra a"fi -. -
For esonde$$is) : Mr. Ramesh chaudhary;-public
c- Prosecutor I'
r . -: 6.
/, . *. . ,
Mr. Bharat Yadav for complainant

¶7

;+, ,. , . , :.'.-.
$*,, >.: : : k
HON'BLE MR. JUSFZCE!iCHAP AR SONGAWA

¶8

been filed u 3.25/2022 registered . , .. I ., at Police Station - - Ghad, 6,j$tyjict!: *, ,;;' ., & ':I ;[ :^i$nl$ -. *<sup>for the offences under **_,,to_ )!,,,?{j$* >:i ,;-: .;:<4:. -..--, . pz9 ,(,./; ;&4-, .,< -,:., 4 ,. .: . ,:-+J i$ '"" ,:?:.: 11. Sections I .43, 341, 307+36,~~%%~~~3ib$C, !,,I/:; ; 4 ,:. ;, j; 6 ,.,J,,,' . ,!,Ai \ . .A .-.+.. :.A:,: ; . .<',;I **J-,?.** y.' ."a,. .,I j . . ..I !! submits that the Learned cotn61:i$f~~~~@,:;,ejtIsner .. +-:,*.a <A ., ;;. <.[:..:;,(i ?,?:..;;.;;,( . , yj:,; -. ;a$ -.,,,LL,l ;;:<;"+ .--J **:'--;,;K*cl -&.id** t - $-a $-a **_-;,;.;i_** -- and as per rejection petitioner is behind the **-.=ids,-T;;UT*di** bars siqce **.U.4.+** - **,,rlr12.** -., **14.03.2022** , . ., ." & ; **=x.=P;.*... q.-..** -.. **_7_** ;.4 ,>"..-&? .$ ~2 . ., ." & ; .f.'/ r, he has no' ';ri&i"a~ :n$e=~dents. Counsel further bail orde submits that as per injury report of injured Kamlesh, all injuries are simple in nature Hence, the petitioner may kindly be released on bail.

¶9

Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the

¶10

have opposed the second bail application.

¶11

Heard. Perused the material available on the record.

¶12

6 ,.,J,,,' . :.A:,: .<',;I J-,~?. y.' ."a,. .,I j . . ..I <.[:..:;,(i ?,?:..;;.;;,( **.** , **yj:,;** .--J **:'--;,;Kcl -&.id** t - $-a $-a -;,;.;i -- .U.4.+ .$ - ,,rlr12. ~2 -., 14.03.2022 , . ., ." & ; =x.=P;.*... q.-.. ., ." & ; ." & ; & ; ; .f.'/ -.. k- --.. ,:;> .: + >!,$..'.

(2 of 2)

[cRLMB-O~/~OI

First bail

of the petitioner was dismissed as withdrawn by this Court vide order dated 08.04.2022 with liberty to file afresh after filing of charge-sheet. NOW, charge-sheet has

¶17

been filed.

¶18

As per injury and X-Ray report of injured Kamlesh, all injuries are simple in nature. Although, as per report of Medical Officer dated 05.03.2022, his injury No.3 is dangerous to life but <, ' T 41 ':r -?T C?, t'u :i ,:;;-4 as per injury report,-thb . . sai,dhnjukGis slmp'le-in nature and no X- a--' , '- 4 -'- , , .--. ray was adviseb;?fo; the same. Therefore,'lo&king)to the above -2 - ..-.,' ,. *' . facts andyeiriurnstances of the case but without &$ressing any : --> .,.!- ', opinion 6n the merits/demerits of the case, this court'deems it .. , ... .., just and proper to enlargec . -. the$eti'tioner,<on . .: -:.., 25,#-: . ., . .. ',.L bail. J ... L. , -: :. ,, . +:?.Q ,?Y!.. z2Zsc ;;<.:.;y., -& 2,; .,flT ;i;i:; , under Section ccordinj~~~t~~seob.ar~l.:~~~~cation 'd..'.i,, . .#,$., , C~ .- , ~,::::x%-w:. fl t Y ,&?$ -.: ..r, '"2 , . {:&<(/j:,'t. ,, +,, **I";h** . **;Q** ' ..,? >. ;, i,;;!irij; ,. -. ... >,::~ C:<<:L++: **_t',.l.%A,_** 439 Cr.P.C. is al~ow~~~;~~and:.-~~~~.s:~~,ol;~lered -. . . .. .,... '.! that the petitioner , " . '". .. ...:**'; **_...';.7:.'_** ;.,,, _;:.:j_ **_;1r4_** -,,. ;'. , i. , **_I_** ,.,. . **.i-;** . ,. ,; .. , :: **;.'i** . , on bail provided he Teekamchand S/O **~hi~~j~l~j~~~a*l~~~~&:~&fil${@ed** .,.. **lJ** ?,! **,L! ;:-,,a** **_e"_** .. .->, i :,.-.;: , fi?,%;,; ;$ ;,;:;:: '. . **:J,. 71; ,2 k . ,[ --.2i:.! !' furnishes a personal bond , /k <.** :the) SU~ of R~.50000/- with two . . ,: . . .- : ;- [> ,.. .. of the learned trial sureties of Rs.25,000/- e$eh* ,-.L t I -> :;/ -*,... %.. to : .,&^{;th$'.$$ti$faction} , f ..q',*3 ,..:., )y*.y .:+ -; ,.&, '"--"?. .7; .+i,-;. ' CP"'&..A'.-F~, ..:;. . ., $ ;.,; ..,+. ).,+>? i.>lj qi concerned on all the judge for his a ppearn$e/bef@~~!;~t~~~~~~~ ' ,,:!I! , ,;, , , 4;;:- ,- $ ,.. ;<>a . .- . ,,:.: **_iki*,;9G,_ * :.;$.. ; .(ri+?::.~,.!,G:{ i ;, dates of hearing and a'$.W~$~~~~,<$$!~~-$~on to do sot.5; :., ";;(.:. ,; ,%,

Teekamchand S/O Shivajilal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Teekamchand S/O Shivajilal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tejprakash Jain S/O Balchand Jain Vs Rameshchand Jain S/O Shri Balchand Jain

Rakesh Kumar S/O Shri Mohan Lal Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramavatar @ Rohit S/O Ramniwas Vs State of Rajasthan

Wasim @ Dainy S/O Iqbal Vs State of Rajasthan

Udami Ram Yadav S/O Shri Het Ram Yadav, Vs Shri Kuldeep Ranka, Ias, Managing Director, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation

Sunil Kumar S/O Ramesh Chand Vs Pawan Kumar Goyal Principal Secretary Department of Local Self Government