Dismissed

Mehraj Mansoor v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC25 Jul 2022CRLMB/5231/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Garg disposed of two bail applications filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. by petitioners arrested in a murder case (IPC 302/34). The High Court rejected the bail plea, noting the petitioners' names appeared in the First Information Report and that bail applications by similarly situated co-accused had been dismissed by the coordinate Bench. The court held that no case

What did the court decide?

Bail applications dismissed at this stage.

Mehraj Mansoor Vs State of Rajasthan — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

/HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5231/2022

¶3

Mehraj Mansoor S/o Sh. Mohammad Ramjan, Aged About 40 Years, R/o H.no. 153, Hammid Colony, Kamla Nehru Nagar, Vistar Yojna, P.s. Pratap Nagar, Jodhpur. (Lodged In Central Jail, Jodhpur).

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

Connected With

¶9

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5162/2022 Sohel Khan Abbasi S/o Jakir Hussain, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Naya Talab, Nagauri Gate, P.s. Nagauri Gate, Jodhpur. (At Present Lodged In Central Jail, Jodhpur.)

¶10

----Petitioner

¶11

Versus

¶12

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶13

----Respondent

¶14

For Petitioner(s)	:	Mr. Sushil Solanki Mr. Surya Deep
For Respondent(s)	:	Mr. Sharwan Bishnoi,PP.

¶15

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG Order

¶16

25/07/2022

¶17

The present bail applications have been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.246/2021 Police Station Boranada, District Jodhpur for the offences punishable under Section 302/34 of IPC.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that no specific role has been assigned to the present petitioners and in the FIR,

¶19

(2 of 2)

¶20

[CRLMB-5231/2022]

¶21

name of accused Mehraj Khan and Dumpy @ Rehman have been specifically mentioned but later on, on the basis the CCTV footage, the police arrested five more accused persons who caused injuries to the deceased. He further submits that the so called eyewitnesses Babulal and Jahangir both have been examined before the Court and they denied the fact that these accused-petitioners caused any injuries to the deceased. The trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioners.

¶22

Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail applications.

¶23

I have considered the arguments advanced before me and gone through the material available on record.

¶24

As per First Information Report, specific name of present petitioners Mehraj Mansoor and Dumpy @ Rehman have been mentioned and after investigation, Police on the basis of CCTV footage, arrested five accused persons along with Sohel Khan. Furthermore, bail applications of similarly situated co-accused Sunil and Aasin Khan have been dismissed by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court. Therefore, no case for grant of bail is made out.

¶25

Hence, the present bail applications filed by the petitioners are hereby dismissed at this stage.

¶26

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J

¶27

4-5-raksha/-

Mehraj Mansoor v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mehraj Mansoor v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Krishan Sagwan Vs State

Ram Kumar and Ors. Vs State

Heera Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Amir Khan Vs State

Smt. Mahima @ Mema Vs State of Rajasthan

Sohel Khan Abbasi Vs State of Rajasthan