In a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the Rajasthan High Court dismissed the plea, holding that the gravity of alleged offences under IPC and POCSO Act involving a pregnant minor victim rendered the case unfit for bail.
Bail application dismissed; accused to remain in jail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4953/2022 Shriram S/o Shri Kishanlal, Resident Of Navalpura, P/s Rajghar, District Alwar ( Accused Presently Confined In Central Jail Alwar)
----Applicant
Versus
The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gurvindra Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Riyasat Ali, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order
04/08/2022
(2 of 2)
[CRLMB-4953/2022]
JKP/11
(SAMEER JAIN),J
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the accused-applicant should be granted bail in a case involving offences under IPC and POCSO Act where the victim is a minor pregnant girl.
Whether the gravity of the offences warrants refusal of bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
NoneReferred
7 provisions across 4 enactments
Shriram S/o Shri Kishanlal
The State Of Rajasthan
SAMEER JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
