Manju Devi v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court at Jodhpur granted anticipatory bail to two petitioners facing charges of cheating and forgery. The court allowed the bail application without expressing an opinion on the merits, directing the release on a personal bond with sureties.
What did the court decide?
Granted anticipatory bail with a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- and two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 48/2022
- Manju Devi W/o Shri Mishrilal, Aged About 39 Years, B/c Lakhara, R/o Chandaval Nagar, Tehsil Sojat, District Pali.
- Mishrilal S/o Shri Mohanlala, Aged About 41 Years, B/c Lakhara, R/o Chandaval Nagar, Tehsil Sojat, District Pali.
----Petitioners
Versus
State, Through Pp
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr Naresh Singh on behalf of Mr Rakesh Arora |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr A.R. Choudhary, Public Prosecutor |
| Mr Dilip Singh Udawat, for the complainant |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Judgment / Order
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners deserve anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC in connection with the FIR registered at Police Station Sojat City.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Manju Devi W/o Shri Mishrilal
- petitioner
Mishrilal S/o Shri Mohanlala
- respondent
State
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/48/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court