Allowed

Rampratap Singh S/O Late Sh. Heera Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC8 Jul 2022CRLMB/2586/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Rajasthan High Court allowed an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for the petitioner facing charges under the Prevention of Corruption Act and IPC, directing the police to release him on bond upon arrest subject to specific conditions.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail allowed upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000 and two sureties of Rs.25,000 each each.

Rampratap Singh S/O Late Sh. Heera Singh Vs State of Rajasthan — Corruption | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2586/2022 Rampratap Singh S/o Late Sh. Heera Singh, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Kailashpuri H.no. 246 Ps Railway Colony Kota Junciton Raj.

¶3

----Petitioner

¶4

Versus

¶5

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶6

----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Babu Lal Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. G.S. Rathore, SPP (SOG)

¶7

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI

¶8

Order

¶9

08/07/2022

¶10

Apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No.359/2020 registered at Police Station Anti Corruption Bureau, Headquarter Jaipur, ACB Kota for the offence(s) under Sections 7 & 7A of Prevention of Corruption Act and under Section 120-B of I.P.C., the petitioner has preferred this anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

¶11

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a false case has been foisted against the petitioner. He has nothing to do with the alleged offences. He is ready to cooperate with the investigation.

¶12

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

¶13

Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the petitioner and taking into account the totality of facts and

¶14

(2 of 2)

¶15

[CRLMB-9222/2022]

¶16

circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail application.

¶17

Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Anti Corruption Bureau, Headquarter Jaipur, ACB Kota in F.I.R. No.359/2020 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner -Rampratap Singh S/o Late Sh. Heera Singh, he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:-

¶18

(i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶19

(ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and

¶20

(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.

¶21

(FARJAND ALI),J

¶22

RAJAT KUMAR/31

Rampratap Singh S/O Late Sh. Heera Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rampratap Singh S/O Late Sh. Heera Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Khalid S/O Aalim Hussain Vs State of Rajasthan

Gaurav Arora S/O Krishan Kumar Arora Vs Central Narcotics Bureau

Suresh Gochar S/O Shri Latoorlal Vs State of Rajasthan

Suresh S/O Maddu Vs State of Rajasthan

Raghuveer Singh @ Raghu Singh S/O Mangu Singh @ Mangilal Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramkishan S/O Sh. Girdhari Lal Gajraj Vs State of Rajasthan