Remanded

Manjeet Singh S/O Satpal Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC14 Dec 2022CRLMB/17828/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners charged under Sections 498-A, 406, and 354 IPC. The court rejected the complaint due to lack of truth, cuminancy, and delay, and noted the accused had withdrawn complaints in similar cases.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted with conditions to preserve peace and answer queries of the trial court and police officer.

Manjeet Singh S/O Satpal Singh Vs State of Rajasthan — Domestic Violence | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

¶3

17828/2022

¶4

Manjeet Singh S/o Satpal Singh, Aged About 33 Years, R/o House No. 23, Gali No. 1, Sahaj Enclave, Noorwal, Ludhiana, Punjab.

¶5

Satpal Singh S/o Inder Singh, Aged About 58 Years, R/o House No. 23, Gali No. 1, Sahaj Enclave, Noorwal, Ludhiana, Punjab.

¶6

Preetam Kaur W/o Satpal Singh, Aged About 54 Years, R/o House No. 23, Gali No. 1, Sahaj Enclave, Noorwal, Ludhiana, Punjab.

¶7

Rajdeep Singh S/o Satpal Singh, Aged About 26 Years, R/o House No. 23, Gali No. 1, Sahaj Enclave, Noorwal, Ludhiana, Punjab.

¶8

Kulvinder Kaur W/o Ankush Bagga, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village Adda, Via Guraya, District Jalandhar, Punjab.

¶9

Lakhvindra Singh S/o Tara Singh, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Village Patti Shahjadpur, Shahbad, Markanda, District Kurushetra, Haryana, District From Ludhiyana 140 Km.

¶10

Sukhbeer Kaur W/o Lakhvindar Singh, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Village Patti Shahjadpur, Shahbad, Markanda, District Kurushetra, Haryana, District From Ludhiyana 140 Km.

¶11

----Petitioners

¶12

Versus

¶13

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶14

----Respondent

¶15

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sandeep Bansiwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Suresh Kumar, PP

¶16

(2 of 4)

¶17

[CRLMB-17828/2022]

¶18

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶19

Order

¶20

14/12/2022

¶21

izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls /kkjk 438 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds rgr ;g vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i= iqfyl Fkkuk efgyk Fkkuk vyoj esa iathc) izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 405@2022 vijk/k varxZr /kkjk 498,] 406] 354 Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk esa fxjQ~rkjh dh vk'kadk ls O;fFkr gksdj is'k fd;k x;k gSA

¶22

cgl ds izkajHk esa gh fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZx.k@ vfHk;qDrx.k us ifjoknh;k ds ifr vfHk;qDr eaftr flag ds dze esa vfxze tekur vkosnu dks bl LVst ij] mfpr izdze ij uohu izkFkZuk i= is'k djus dh Lora=rk ds lkFk] okfil fy;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶23

'ks"k izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k ds laca/k esa fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k dk rdZ jgk fd izkFkhZx.k funksZ"k gS] izkFkhZx.k ls vfHkj{kkRed vuqla/kku dh vko';drk ugha gS] yxk;s x;s vkjksi fujk/kkj o dkYifud gS] vr% izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k dks vfxze tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh xbZA

¶24

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us vfxze tekur vkosnu dk fojks/k djrs gq, tkfgj fd;k rFkk vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks ns[krs gq, vfxze tekur vkosnu [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶25

nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksZa ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA

¶26

(3 of 4) [CRLMB-17828/2022]

¶27

gLrxr izdj.k esa izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k la[;k 02 ls 07 ifjoknh;k ds ifr ds ifjtu gS rFkk muds fo:) ;g lkekU; vkjksi gS fd fookg ds i'pkr mUgksaus ngst dh ekax dks ysdj ifjoknh;k dks izrkfMr fd;k o dwzjrkiw.kZ O;ogkj fd;k rFkk L=h/ku ykSVkus ls badkj dj fn;kA

¶28

izdj.k esa miyC/k leLr rF;kRed fLFkfr rFkk izLrqr fd;s x;s rdksZa dh jks'kuh esa] izdj.k ds bl izdze ij ekeys ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk] izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g vfxze tekur vkosnu Lohdkj fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA

¶29

ifj.kker% izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k lriky flag] fizre dkSj] jktnhi flag] dqyfoUn dkSj] y[kfoUnz flag o lq[kchj dkSj }kjk izLrqr ;g vfxze tekur dk izkFkZuk i= vUrxZr /kkjk 438 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds rgr Lohdkj fd;k tkdj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZx.k esa ls izR;sd izkFkhZ bl ekeys esa fxjQ~rkjh dh voLFkk esa ,d yk[k :i;s dk Lo;a dk ca/k i= ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks izfrHkwfr lacaf/kr iqfyl Fkkus ds Hkkjlk/kd vf/kdkjh@vuqla/kku vf/kdkjh dh larqf"V dh is'k dj rLnhd djk ns rks mUgsa fuEu 'krksaZ ds lkFk tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tkos%&

¶30

1- fd izkFkhZ iqfyl vf/kdkjh }kjk iwNs tkusokys ifjiz'uksa dk mRrj nsus ds fy;s tSls vkSj tc visf{kr gks] miyC/k gksxkA

¶31

2- fd izkFkhZ bl ekeys ds rF;ksa ls voxr fdlh O;fDr dks U;k;ky; ;k fdlh iqfyl vf/kdkjh ds le{k ,sls rF;ksa dks izdV u djus ds fy;s eukus ds okLrs izR;{k% vFkok ijks{k :i ls mls dksbZ mRizsj.kk] /kedh ;k opu ugha nsxkA

¶32

(4 of 4) [CRLMB-17828/2022]

¶33

3- fd izkFkhZ fcuk U;k;ky; dh iwoZ vuqefr ds Hkkjr ugha NksM+sxkA

¶34

izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr eaftr flag ds dze esa ;g vfxze tekur vkosnu izR;kg~r (Withdraw) fd;s tkus ds vk/kkj ij] izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks mijksDr Lora=rk iznku djrs gq,] [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA

¶35

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶36

Murari/63

Manjeet Singh S/O Satpal Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manjeet Singh S/O Satpal Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajanti W/O Kailash Vs State of Rajasthan

Deepak @ Kaliya Son of Ram Kishan Vs State of Rajasthan

Iddar @ Idrish Son of Munshi Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Tosif Khan Son of Shri Ayyub Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Hansraj Meena S/O Shri Ramubalal Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Kapil S/O Jgdish, Vs State of Rajasthan