Dismissed

Rajanti W/O Kailash v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC13 Dec 2022CRLMB/10684/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Rajasthan High Court rejected an application for anticipatory bail filed by 13 individuals after the proceedings against them in an FIR under Sections 147, 341, 302, 120B of IPC and Section 438 CrPC were quashed by another High Court judge due to lack of territorial jurisdiction and no credible material.

What did the court decide?

Application for anticipatory bail dismissed; status quo of quashed proceedings maintained.

Rajanti W/O Kailash Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 10684/2022

¶3

Rajanti W/o Kailash, Aged About 63 Years, R/o Bhanwra, Dhhani Peepli Wala, P.s. Bamanwas, Dist. Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan)

¶4

Madan Lal S/o Kalyan Prasad, Aged About 61 Years, R/o Bhanwra, Dhhani Peepli Wala, P.s. Bamanwas, Dist. Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan)

¶5

Lokesh S/o Kailash Prasad, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Bhanwra, Dhhani Peepli Wala, P.s. Bamanwas, Dist. Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan)

¶6

Keshanti W/o Nawal Koshore, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Bhanwra, Dhhani Peepli Wala, P.s. Bamanwas, Dist. Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan)

¶7

Pritam Devi W/o Madan Lal, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Bhanwra, Dhhani Peepli Wala, P.s. Bamanwas, Dist. Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan)

¶8

Raajit S/o Madan Lal, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Bhanwra, Dhhani Peepli Wala, P.s. Bamanwas, Dist. Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan)

¶9

Ashish S/o Madan Lal, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Bhanwra, Dhhani Peepli Wala, P.s. Bamanwas, Dist. Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan)

¶10

Nawal Kishore S/o Kailash, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Bhanwra, Dhhani Peepli Wala, P.s. Bamanwas, Dist. Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan)

¶11

Hareti S/o Kalyan, Aged About 67 Years, R/o Bhanwra, Dhhani Peepli Wala, P.s. Bamanwas, Dist. Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan)

¶12

Kailash S/o Kalyan, Aged About 66 Years, R/o Bhanwra, Dhhani Peepli Wala, P.s. Bamanwas, Dist. Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan)

¶13

Guddi W/o Hareti Lal, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Bhanwra, Dhhani Peepli Wala, P.s. Bamanwas, Dist. Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan)

¶14

Sher Singh S/o Hareti Lal, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Bhanwra, Dhhani Peepli Wala, P.s. Bamanwas, Dist. Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan)

¶15

Ram Naresh S/o Hareti Lal, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Bhanwra, Dhhani Peepli Wala, P.s. Bamanwas, Dist. Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan)

----Petitioners

[CRLMB-10684/2022]

(2 of 4)

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶21

----Respondent

¶22

For Petitioner(s) : Dr. Mahesh Sharma For : Mr. Suresh Kumar, PP Respondent(s) Mr. Amir Aziz

¶23

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶24

Order

¶25

13/12/2022

¶26

izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls /kkjk 438 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds rgr ;g vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i= iqfyl Fkkuk&ckeuokl ftyk&lokbZek/kksiqj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k&155@2020 vijk/k varxZr /kkjk 147] 341] 302] 120ch Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk esa fxjQ~rkjh dh vk'kadk ds QyLo:i vfxze tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dh izkFkZuk ds lkFk is'k fd;k x;k gSA

¶27

fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dk rdZ gS fd vfHk;qDrx.k funksZ"k gSa] iqfyl }kjk bl ekeys esa ckn vuqla/kku orZeku vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) dksbZ ekeyk izekf.kr ugha ekurs gq, udkjkRed vafre izfrosnu izLrqr fd;k x;k Fkk] miyC/k lkexzh ds vuqlkj Hkh erdk yNek dh eR;q nq?kZVuk ds ifj.kkeLo:i gksuk izdV gqvk gS] fdlh Hkh Lora= izR;{kn'khZ lk{kh us ?kVuk dh iqf"V ugha dh gSA lkEifRrd fookn dks ysdj feF;k vkjksi.k vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) ifjoknh i{k }kjk fd;k x;k gS] dksbZ vfHkj{kkRed vuqla/kku 'ks"k ugha gS] vdkj.k

¶28

(3 of 4)

¶29

[CRLMB-10684/2022]

¶30

fxjQ~rkj fd;k x;k rks muds fof/kd vf/kdkjksa dk guu gksxk] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dks vfxze tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶31

mUgksaus vius rdksaZ ds leFkZu esa fuEu U;kf;d n`"VkUr is'k fd;s&

¶32

Premlata Gupta Vs. State, S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Appl. 8714/2022 Raj. High Court, BenchJaipur.

¶33

Rajendra Kumar Vs. State, S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Appl. 5434/2022 Raj. High Court, BenchJaipur.

¶34

Fattal Vs. St. S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Appl. 4936/2022 Raj. High Court, Bench-Jaipur.

¶35

Jamil Vs st. S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Appl. 4937/2022 Raj. High Court, Bench-Jaipur;

¶36

Smt. Manni & Ors. Vs. St. S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Appl. 14537/2022 Raj. High Court, BenchJaipur;

¶37

Vijendra Vs. St. S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Appl. 9245/2017 Raj. High Court, Bench-Jodhpur.

¶38

blds foijhr fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd rFkk fo}ku vf/koDrk ifjoknh us fuosnu fd;k fd vuqla/kku fu"i{k ugha Fkk] ifjoknh i{k dh vksj ls U;k;ky; ds le{k fojks/k ;kfpdk izLrqr dj /kkjk 200&202 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds rgr c;ku ys[kc) djk;s Fks] rRi'pkr fo}ku eftLVªsV U;k;ky; }kjk vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) /kkjk 302lifBr /kkjk 120ch Hkk-na-la- ds vkjksi esa izlaKku fy;k tk pqdk gSA mlds fo:) bl U;k;ky; esa fuxjkuh ;kfpdk la[;k 1391@2022 izLrqr dh x;h Fkh tks [kkfjt djrs gq, izlaKku vkns'k dh iqf"V dh x;h gSA xaHkhj vijk/k ls lacaf/kr ekeyk gS] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk rFkk vfHkj{kkRed vuqla/kku esa vfHk;qDrx.k

¶39

(4 of 4)

¶40

[CRLMB-10684/2022]

¶41

dh vko';drk dks ns[krs gq, vfxze tekur dk izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶42

nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksaZ ds leFkZu esa i=koyh ij miyC/k lkexzh dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶43

fo}ku vf/koDrk vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls tks U;kf;d n"VkUr izLrqr fd;s x;s gSa] izdj.k fo'ks"k ds rF;ksa ij fuHkZj djrs gSaA gLrxr ekeys esa vuqla/kku vf/kdkjh }kjk lk{; dk lw{e fo'ys"k.k vkSj foospu djrs gq, fu.kZ; dh Hkkafr vuqla/kku dk urhtk izLrqr fd;k gS ftlls vlger gksrs gq, fo}ku eftLVªsV U;k;ky; }kjk /kkjk 200&202 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds c;ku ys[kc) djus ds i'pkr vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) /kkjk 147] 149] 341] 302] 120ch Hkk-na-la- ds vkjksi esa izlaKku fy;k x;k gS rFkk ;g vkns'k mPp U;k;ky; ls ;Fkkor jgk gSA vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) lkEifRrd fookn dks ysdj erdk yNek dh gR;k dkfjr djus dk vkjksi gSA

¶44

vr% izLrqr rdksZa] vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) yxk;s x;s vk{ksi] vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk ,oa izdj.k dh ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dks vfxze tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr ugha gksrk gSA

¶45

ifj.kker% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA

¶46

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶47

Mittal/20

Rajanti W/O Kailash v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajanti W/O Kailash v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jalim Singh @ Vishnu S/O Shri Harbhan Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Jasveer Singh S/O Jaswant Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramkumar Son of Bodanram Vs the State of Rajasthan

Deena Son of Shri Niroti Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Dhanni D/O Narayan W/O Ladhu Vs State of Rajasthan

Pratap Singh @ Sonu S/O Late Shri Rajkaran Vs State of Rajasthan