Allowed

Iddar @ Idrish Son of Munshi Khan v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC13 Dec 2022SOSA/1256/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal appeal, the court suspended the imprisonment sentences of three accused-appellants pending the final hearing of their appeal, subject to the deposit of fines and furnishing personal and surety bonds with the trial court.

What did the court decide?

Application for suspension of sentence is allowed; appellants to deposit fines, furnish personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- and two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each.

Iddar @ Idrish Son of Munshi Khan Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence

¶3

Application No.1256/2022

¶4

¶5

S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 1921/2022

¶6

Iddar @ Idrish Son Of Munshi Khan, R/o Bhalesar, Mps Tapukara District Alwar (At Present Confined At Sub Jail Kishangarhbas)

¶7

Nasir Son Of Leela, R/o Bhalesar, Mps Tapukara District Alwar (At Present Confined At Sub Jail Kishangarhbas)

¶8

Wajid Son Of Leela, R/o Bhalesar, Mps Tapukara District Alwar (At Present Confined At Sub Jail Kishangarhbas)

¶9

----Appellants

¶10

Versus

¶11

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p

¶12

----Respondent

¶13

For Appellant(s) : Mr. Jiya Ur Rahman, Adv. For : Mr. Suresh Kumar, P.P. Respondent(s)

¶14

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Order

¶15

13/12/2022

¶16

Heard learned counsel for the parties on the application filed for suspension of sentence and perused the entire material available on record.

¶17

Learned counsel for the accused-applicants submits that accused-applicants were on bail during trial and presently they are behind bars. Learned

¶18

(2 of 3)

¶19

[SOSA-1256/2022 in CRLAS-1921/2022]

¶20

counsel further submits that final hearing of the appeal is likely to take time thus sentence of the accused-applicants may be suspended.

¶21

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer regarding suspension of sentence.

¶22

I have considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties.

¶23

Without commenting upon the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to suspend the sentence awarded to the applicants.

¶24

Accordingly, subject to deposition of fine imposed by the learned trial Court on the accused-applicants , the application for suspension of sentence is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence of imprisonment awarded by the learned trial Court against the accused-applicants namely, 1.Iddar @ Idrish S/o Munshi Khan, 2.Nasir S/o

¶25

Leela & 3.Wajid S/o Leela in Sessions Case No.34/12/2016 (CIS No.664/2016) shall remain suspended during pendency of appeal and they shall be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- along with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before this court on

¶26

(3 of 3)

¶27

[SOSA-1256/2022 in CRLAS-1921/2022]

¶28

16^th January, 2023 and thereafter as and when called

¶29

upon to do so.

¶30

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶31

DANISH USMANI /64

Iddar @ Idrish Son of Munshi Khan v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Iddar @ Idrish Son of Munshi Khan v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jalim Singh @ Vishnu S/O Shri Harbhan Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Jasveer Singh S/O Jaswant Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramkumar Son of Bodanram Vs the State of Rajasthan

Deena Son of Shri Niroti Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Dhanni D/O Narayan W/O Ladhu Vs State of Rajasthan

Pratap Singh @ Sonu S/O Late Shri Rajkaran Vs State of Rajasthan