Allowed

Sumer Singh S/O Mahaveer Prashad v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC13 Sept 2022CRLMB/12939/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In S.B. Criminal Misc Bail Applications No. 12939/2022 and No. 13703/2022, a Single Bench of the Rajasthan High Court at Jaipur, relying on Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, granted bail to two petitioners accused in an affray case.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted to both Sumer Singh and Anil @ Gattu on condition to appear on the first sitting of the Sessions Court.

Sumer Singh S/O Mahaveer Prashad Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 12939/2022

¶3

Sumer Singh S/o Mahaveer Prashad, Aged About 38 Years, Resident Of Dalelpura, Police Thana Khetri, Dist. Jhunjhunu ( At Present Dist. Jail Jhunjhunu)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

Connected With

¶9

S.B. Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 13703/2022 Anil @ Gattu S/o Madanlal, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Badiya Nala, Police Thana - Gudagordji, DistJhunjhunu (Raj) (At Present Confined In Jail Jhunjhunu)

¶10

----Petitioner

¶11

Versus

¶12

State Of Rajasthan, Through Its P.p.

¶13

----Respondent

¶14

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Omveer Singh Saini For : Mr. Babu Lal Nasuna, PP Respondent(s)

¶15

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶16

Order

¶17

13/09/2022

¶18

izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq iFkd&iFkd tekur izkFkZuk i= n.M izfdz;k lafgrk dh /kkjk 439 ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk&fclkm] ftyk&>qa>quq esa ntZ izFke

¶19

(2 of 3)

¶20

[CRLMB-12939/2022]

¶21

lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k& 43@22 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 457] 380 Hkk-na-la- esa is'k fd;s x;s gaSA

¶22

fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k us rdZ fn;k fd vfHk;qDrx.k funksZ"k gSa] mUgsa bl izdj.k esa feF;k :i ls vkfyIr fd;k x;k gSA dkQh le; ls vfHkj{kk eas gSa] izdj.k esa egRoiw.kZ vuqla/kku gks pqdk gS] fopkj.k esa le; yxsxk] blfy, izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dks tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶23

blds foijhr fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us fuosnu fd;k fd vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) dkQh la[;k esa vkijkf/kd izdj.k iwoZ ls gh lafLFkr gSa] vr% vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks ns[krs gq, tekur vkosnu [kkfjt fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dhA

¶24

nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶25

izdj.k ds rF;ksa] ifjfLFkfr;ksa] izLrqr rdksaZ ,oa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vfHkj{kk vof/k dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, izdj.k ds xq.k&nks"kksa ij fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶26

ifj.kker% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr 1- lqesj flag iq= egkohj izlkn rFkk 2- vfuy mQZ xV~Vw iq= enuyky dh vksj ls izLrqr nksuksa tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;s tkdj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZx.k bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; ;k varfjrh U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mUgsa cqyk;k tk,] mifLFkfr gsrq izR;sd }kjk nks yk[k :i;s dk eqpydk rFkk ,d&,d yk[k :i;s dh nks lqn`< tekursa ¼ftuesa nksukas tekufr;ksa ds

¶27

(3 of 3)

¶28

[CRLMB-12939/2022]

¶29

vk/kkj dkMZ dh izfr;ka o de ls de ,d tekurh ds ,dy LokfeRo dh vpy lEifRr ds dkxtkr gksaxs½ ] izLrqr dj izekf.kr djkosa rks gLrxr izdj.k esa mUgsa tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk,A

¶30

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶31

Mittal /7-8

Sumer Singh S/O Mahaveer Prashad v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sumer Singh S/O Mahaveer Prashad v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahendra Kumar S/O Chunni Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Chhatraram S/O Peetharam Vs State of Rajasthan

Faisal Ali Son of Afjal Ali Vs State of Rajasthan

Abhilasha D/O Subhesh Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Mosin Son of Saleh Mohammad Vs State of Rajasthan

Mukesh Meena S/O Shri Laxminarayan Meena Vs State of Rajasthan