Allowed

Mukesh Meena S/O Shri Laxminarayan Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC13 Sept 2022CRLMB/12216/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge bail application seeking release on regular bail in a criminal case involving IPC and Arms Act charges. Court allowed bail after considering overall facts without expressing opinion on merits.

What did the court decide?

Accused petitioner Mukesh Meena ordered to be released on bail on personal bond with two sureties and stipulation to appear on subsequent dates.

Mukesh Meena S/O Shri Laxminarayan Meena Vs State of… — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

¶3

12216/2022

¶4

Mukesh Meena S/o Shri Laxminarayan Meena, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Ramniwas, P.s. Ataru, Distt. Baran (Raj.) (The Accused Petitioner Is In Custody At Sub Jail Chabbra, Distt. Baran)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sumer Sharma, Adv. For : Mr. Babu Lal Nasuna, PP Respondent(s)

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶11

Order

¶12

13/09/2022

¶13

This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in FIR No.158/2022 registered at Police Station Chhabra, District Baran for the offence(s) under Section(s) 341, 323, 504, 452, 326, 307 & 34 of IPC and Section(s) 4/25 of Arms Act.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel fur ther submits that the name of the petitioner is not

¶15

(2 of 2)

¶16

[CRLMB-12216/2022]

¶17

mentioned in the FIR and co-accused has already been enlarged on bail by the coordinate bench of this Court. He also submits that the accused-petitioner is in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

¶18

Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the same.

¶19

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶20

Therefore, this bail application is allowed and accused-petitioner Mukesh Meena S/o Shri Laxminarayan Meena is ordered to be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶21

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶22

GAURAV SHARMA /02

Mukesh Meena S/O Shri Laxminarayan Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mukesh Meena S/O Shri Laxminarayan Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahendra Kumar S/O Chunni Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Chhatraram S/O Peetharam Vs State of Rajasthan

Faisal Ali Son of Afjal Ali Vs State of Rajasthan

Abhilasha D/O Subhesh Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Mosin Son of Saleh Mohammad Vs State of Rajasthan

Sumer Singh S/O Mahaveer Prashad Vs State of Rajasthan