Dismissed

Mahendra Kumar S/O Chunni Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC12 Sept 2022CRLMB/8271/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Multiple bail applicants under Section 438 CrPC regarding charges under Sections 302 and 120B IPC. The bench disposed of all petitions jointly, holding that separate disposal is unnecessary. The High Court declined interference, deeming the examination process, including preliminary screening and assistants' conduct, sufficient to prevent malpractice without trial interference.

What did the court decide?

All filed bail applications were dismissed and dismissed jointly.

Mahendra Kumar S/O Chunni Lal Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 8271/2022 Mahendra Kumar S/o Chunni Lal, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Vishnu Nagar, Dhandiya, Luni, Distt Jodhpur

¶3

----Petitioner

¶4

Versus

¶5

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp.

¶6

----Respondent

¶7

S.B. Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 8716/2022 Chhatraram S/o Peetharam, Aged About 47 Years, Resident Of 137, Fagotara Ki Dhani, Fagotara, Police Station Jhab, District Jalore (Raj.)

¶8

----Petitioner

¶9

Versus

¶10

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶11

----Respondent

¶12

S.B. Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 9876/2022

¶13

Chunni Lal Vishnoi S/o Shri Kishnaram, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Badanaya, Jalore (Rajasthan)

¶14

Prakash Kumar S/o Shri Gangaram Vishnoi, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Kuka, Tehsil Bagora, District Jalore (Rajasthan)

¶15

----Petitioners

¶16

Versus

¶17

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp.

¶18

----Respondent

¶19

S.B. Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 10290/2022 Sharwan Kumar Vishnoi S/o Jodharam, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Gawdi, Dungarwa, District Jalore (Raj.)

(2 of 8)

[CRLMB-8271/2022]

----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor

¶25

----Respondent

¶26

S.B. Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 10291/2022 Prakash Chand S/o Sujanaram, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Kooka, District Jalore, Raj.

¶27

----Petitioner

¶28

Versus

¶29

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor

¶30

----Respondent

¶31

S.B. Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 10292/2022

¶32

Abhishek S/o Mohanlal, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Ramesh Colony, Sanchore, District Jalore.

¶33

Vijay Kumar S/o Rajuram, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Kooka, District Jalore, Raj.

¶34

----Petitioners

¶35

Versus

¶36

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor

¶37

----Respondent

¶38

S.B. Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 10293/2022 Omprakash S/o Ashuram, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Ranodhar, District Jalore, Raj.

¶39

----Petitioner

¶40

Versus

¶41

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor

¶42

----Respondent

¶43

S.B. Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 10298/2022 Surendra Singh S/o Mohan Lal, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Poonam Ji Dhaka Ki Dhani, Mandawas, Pali, District Pali, Rajasthan.

----Petitioner

[CRLMB-8271/2022]

(3 of 8)

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor

¶49

----Respondent

¶50

S.B. Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 10668/2022 Prakash Parawa S/o Bhakharram Vishnoi, R/o Parwa, Police Station Chitalwana, Dist. Jalore, Raj.

¶51

----Petitioner

¶52

Versus

¶53

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶54

----Respondent

¶55

S.B. Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 10669/2022 Manoj Jyani S/o Gangaram, R/o Rohila, Ps Dhori Manna, Dist. Barmer, Presently R/o Ambedkar Colony, Mahaveer Nagar, Barmer.

¶56

----Petitioner

¶57

Versus

¶58

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶59

----Respondent

¶60

S.B. Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 10670/2022 Jagdish Paldiya S/o Sukhram Vishnoi, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Kookawas, Ps Bagoda, Dist. Jalore, Raj.

¶61

----Petitioner

¶62

Versus

¶63

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶64

----Respondent

¶65

S.B. Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 10958/2022 Mahipal S/o Bhakraram, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Karavdi, Tehsil Akoli, District Jalore Rajasthan

¶66

----Petitioner

¶67

Versus

¶68

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

----Respondent

(4 of 8)

[CRLMB-8271/2022]

S.B. Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 12294/2022 Rohit Kumar @ Naveen Chandel S/o Kanhaiyalal, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Moti Nagar Khairda, Sawaimadhopur, Distt. Sawaimadhopur Raj.

¶73

----Petitioner

¶74

Versus

¶75

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶76

----Respondent

¶77

S.B. Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 12295/2022 Satyanarayan S/o Rambharos, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Kawasd, Sawaimadhopur, Distt. Sawaimadhopur (Raj.)

¶78

----Petitioner

¶79

Versus

¶80

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶81

----Respondent

¶82

S.B. Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 12298/2022 Narendra Vishnoi S/o Gangaram, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Kervi Pura, Distt. Jalore (Raj.)

¶83

----Petitioner

¶84

Versus

¶85

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶86

----Respondent

¶87

S.B. Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 12300/2022 Poonamaram S/o Virdharam, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Dhayalon Ki Dhani, Padardi, Distt. Jalore Raj.

¶88

----Petitioner

¶89

Versus

¶90

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶91

----Respondent S.B. Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 12716/2022

¶92

Kallaram S/o Ummedram, Aged About 40 Years,

¶93

(5 of 8)

¶94

[CRLMB-8271/2022]

¶95

R/o Maktot Tehsil Todabhim District Karauli, Raj.

¶96

Ravindra Kumar S/o Samaysingh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Nagla Bandh, Tehsil Bharatpur District Bharatpur.

¶97

----Petitioners

¶98

Versus

¶99

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶100

----Respondent

¶101

S.B. Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 13701/2022 Ravindra Kumar Son Of Samay Singh, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of Nagla Bandh Teh. Bharatpur Distt. Bharatpur.

¶102

----Petitioner

¶103

Versus

¶104

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶105

----Respondent

¶106

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gajveer Singh Rajawat Mr. Sudhir Jain Mr. Deepak Chauhan Mr. Yogesh Kumar Sharma For : Mr. Ghan Shyam Singh Respondent(s) Rathore, AAG & Special PP (SOG) Mr. Himanshu Sharma, Ad.S.P., ATS & SOG, Jaipur.

¶107

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶108

Order

¶109

12/09/2022

¶110

izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls /kkjk 438 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds rgr mDr lHkh vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i= iqfyl Fkkuk&xaxkiqj flVh] ftyk&lokbZek/kksiqj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk

¶111

(6 of 8)

¶112

[CRLMB-8271/2022]

¶113

fjiksVZ la[;k&402@2021 vijk/k varxZr /kkjk 420] 120ch Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk rFkk 4@6 jktLFkku lkoZtfud ijh{kk ¼vuqfpr lk/ku dk iz;ksx½ vf/kfu;e] 1992 ¼vUoh{kk/khu 420] 120ch Hkk-na-la-] 66ch] 72 lwpuk izkS|ksfxdh vf/kfu;e] 2000 rFkk 4] 5] 6] 6, jktLFkku lkoZtfud ijh{kk vf/kfu;e] 1992½ esa fxjQ~rkjh dh vk'kadk ds QyLo:i vfxze tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dh izkFkZuk ds lkFk is'k fd;s x;s gSaA

¶114

pwafd mDr lHkh tekur izkFkZuk i= ,d gh izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ls lacaf/kr gSa] vr% mDr lHkh tekur vkosnuksa dk fuLrkj.k ,d lkFk ,d gh vkns'k ds ek/;e ls fd;k tk jgk gSA

¶115

fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dk rdZ gS fd vfHk;qDrx.k iw.kZr% funksZ"k gSa] muds }kjk jhV ijh{kk ls lacaf/kr dksbZ iz'u i= u rks izkIr fd;k vkSj u gh miyC/k djk;k] muds }kjk fdlh izdkj ls mDr ijh{kk iz'u i= yhd ugha fd;k x;k gS] lg&vfHk;qDrx.k }kjk iqfyl vfHkj{kk esa jgrs gq, nh x;h bRryk ds vuqlj.k esa mUgsa bl vijk/k ls tksMs tkus dk vuqfpr iz;kl fd;k tk jgk gS] vfHk;qDrx.k vuqla/kku esa lg;ksx djus gsrq rRij gSa] dksbZ vfHkj{kkRed vuqla/kku 'ks"k ugha gS] vdkj.k fxjQ~rkj fd;k x;k rks muds fof/kd vf/kdkjksa dk guu gksxk] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dks vfxze tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶116

blds foijhr fo}ku vfrfjDr egkf/koDrk ,oa ,l-vksth- ds fof'k"V yksd vfHk;kstd us fuosnu fd;k fd vfHk;qDrx.k ls vuqla/kku gksuk 'ks"k gS] gLrxr vfHk;qDrx.k

¶117

(7 of 8)

¶118

[CRLMB-8271/2022]

¶119

us vU; lg&vfHk;qDrx.k ds lkFk feydj jhV ijh{kk dk iz'ui= ijh{kk ls iwoZ izkIr fd;k vkSj mlds ek/;e ls udy djus@djokus dk vkjksi gLrxr vfHk;qDrx.k ij jgk gS ftlds laca/k esa vfHkj{kkRed vuqla/kku dh vko';drk gS] mudk ;g Hkh fuosnu gS fd bl LVst ij vfxze tekur dh lqfo/kk nh x;h rks vuqla/kku foijhr :i ls izHkkfor gks ldrk gS] vUr esa mDr vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶120

nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksaZ ds leFkZu esa i=koyh ij miyC/k lkexzh dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶121

gLrxr izdj.k esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ rFkk vU; lkexzh ds vuqlkj ;g vkjksi gS fd jkT; ljdkj ds f'k{kk foHkkx }kjk jhV ijh{kk&2021 dk vk;kstu djk;k tk jgk Fkk] bl ijh{kk ds vk;kstu ls iwoZ vU; eq[;@lg&vfHk;qDrx.k }kjk ,d fxjksg ds lnL; ds :i esa fuf'pr LFkku ls djksMksa :i;s nsdj iz'u i= izkIr fd;k rFkk vU; lg&vfHk;qDrx.k ds lg;ksx ls mlds mRrj rS;kj djokdj fxjksg ds vU; lnL;ksa ds ek/;e ls vyx&vyx ftyksa esa p;fur LFkkuksa ij vH;fFkZ;ksa dks mijksDr iz'ui= ijh{kk ls iwoZ miyC/k djk;k x;kA gLrxr vfHk;qDrx.k ij mijksDr iz'ui= vkSj muds mRrjksa ds vk/kkj ij ijh{kk ls iwoZ udy djus@djokus vkfn ds xaHkhj vkjksi gSaA

¶122

bl izdkj ds vijk/k ds dkj.k mijksDr ijh{kk dks fujLr djuk iMk ftlls djhc iPphl yk[k vH;fFkZ;ksa ds fgr foijhr :i ls izHkkfor gq,] mUgsa vkfFkZd gkfu gqbZ rFkk jkT; ljdkj dks Hkh djhc rhu lkS djksM :i;s dk uqdlku

¶123

(8 of 8)

¶124

[CRLMB-8271/2022]

¶125

gqvkA bl izdkj ds vijk/k ls dbZ vH;fFkZ;ksa dk Hkfo"; izfrdwy :i ls izHkkfor gksrk gS rFkk lkoZtfud ijh{kk dh 'kqfprk o fo'oluh;rk foijhr :i ls izHkkfor gksrh gSA vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) vuqla/kku djus gsrq i;kZIr lkexzh i=koyh ij miyC/k gSA bl LVst ij vfHk;qDrx.k dks vfxze tekur ij fjgk fd;k x;k rks miyC/k gks ldus okyh lk{; o lw= lekIr gks tkosaxs rFkk vuqla/kku foijhr :i ls izHkkfor gksxk] tcfd ,sls ekeyksa esa fu"i{k o xgu vuqla/kku vR;Ur vko';d gSA

¶126

vr% izLrqr rdksZa] vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) yxk;s x;s vk{ksi] vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk ,oa izdj.k dh ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dks vfxze tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr ugha gksrk gSA

¶127

ifj.kker% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr mDr lHkh vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd;s tkrs gSaA vkns'k dh izfr izR;sd i=koyh esa layXu dh tkosA

¶128

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶129

Mittal /16to29 & 32to 35

Mahendra Kumar S/O Chunni Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahendra Kumar S/O Chunni Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abdul Kalu Son of Abdul Hafiz Vs State of Rajasthan

Dinesh S/O Radhakishan Vs State of Rajasthan

Tanveer S/O Najeer Vs State of Rajasthan

Chhatraram S/O Peetharam Vs State of Rajasthan

Faisal Ali Son of Afjal Ali Vs State of Rajasthan

Chunni Lal Vishnoi S/O Shri Kishnaram Vs State of Rajasthan