The single judge allowed the application for leave to appeal against the impugned judgment. The memo of the leave appeal is to be treated as an appeal and admitted for registration. Additionally, a bailable warrant was issued against the respondents.
Leave to appeal admitted; memo treated as appeal; bailable warrant against respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JODHPUR
S.B. Crml Leave To Appeal No. 76/2019
Arjun Solanki
----Appellant
Versus
Mukesh Kumar & Ors.
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Nayab Khan for Mr. SK Dadhich For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
05/07/2022
Heard.
This Court is of the opinion that there are valid and substantial grounds for grant of leave to the appellant for filing the appeal against the impugned judgment.
Accordingly, the application for grant of leave to appeal is allowed. The memo of leave to appeal be treated as an appeal and it be registered as such.
Admit.
Let bailable warrant of Rs.25,000/- be issued against the
respondents.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.
177-nirmala/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant leave to the appellant to file an appeal against the impugned judgment.
Arjun Solanki
Mukesh Kumar
Dr. Justice Pushpendra Singh Bhati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
