High Court of Rajasthan granted leave to appeal against a prior judgment, admitting the appeal and ordering a bailable warrant of Rs. 25,000 against accused-respondent no. 2.
Leave to file appeal allowed; memo treated and registered as appeal; bailable warrant of Rs. 25,000 issued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[CRLLA-58/2022]
(1 of 1)
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JODHPUR
S.B. Crml Leave To Appeal No. 58/2022
Madhav Prasad Jethaliya
----Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Ajay Kumar Vyas For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mukesh Trivedi, PP
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
04/07/2022
This Court is of the opinion that there are valid and substantial grounds for grant of leave to the appellant for filing the appeal against the impugned judgment.
Accordingly, the application for grant of leave to appeal is allowed. The memo of leave to appeal be treated as an appeal and it be registered as such.
Admit.
Let bailable warrant of Rs.25,000/- be issued against the accused-respondent no.2.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.
100-Sudheer/-
Madhav Prasad Jethaliya
State Of Rajasthan
Dr. Puspendra Singh Bhati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
