This court dismissed a belated review petition. The petitioners claimed their case was of a different nature than the decided bunch, but the court found the prayer identical and dismissed the petition on merits and limitation grounds.
The review petition is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1 of 2)
[WRW-13/2021]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Review Petition (Writ) No.13/2021
In
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.13422/2017
----Petitioners
Versus
For Petitioner(s) : Dr. Ganesh Parihar For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
Order
(2 of 2)
[WRW-13/2021]
23/10/2021
This review petition has been preferred stating therein that the case filed by the petitioners was of different nature and ought not have been included in the bunch of writ petitions which were decided by this court vide its order dated 20.12.2019.
I have carefully looked into the prayer made by the petitioners which is identical to the prayer made by the other petitioners in the bunch of writ petitions. The cases have been decided commonly. No case for review is made out and even otherwise the review petition is highly belated. On the ground of limitation also, the review petition deserves to be dismissed.
The review petition is accordingly dismissed.
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),J
Karan/48
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the review petition, filed claiming the petition was of different nature, deserves to be entertained?
Naveen Kumar Khandal and Others
State Of Rajasthan
The Director, Treasury And Accounts Department
Rajasthan Public Service Commission
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
