This D.B. Special Appeal against a Single Judge's judgment was dismissed. The High Court found no reason to interfere, holding that the appellant was not engaged by the respondent, a factual finding requiring no intervention.
None. The appeal was dismissed, confirming that the appellant was not employed by the respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 133/2020
Budhram Khatana S/o Shri Mungaram, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Dhani Bheemka Wali, Village And Post Kakariya, Tehsil Khetri, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.)
----Appellant
Versus
The Chief Manager, Rsrtc, Khetri Depot, Jhunjhunu (Raj.)
----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. Anshuman Saxena For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. AKIL KURESHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Order
06/12/2021
This appeal is directed against the judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 21.08.2019.
The learned Single Judge confirmed the order of learned trial court by holding that the petitioner was not engaged by the State Roadways Transport Corporation. Being a question of fact, we do not see any reason to interfere.
The appeal is dismissed. Connected applications if any stand disposed of.
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
(AKIL KURESHI),CJ
KAMLESH KUMAR/N.GANDHI/29
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the Single Judge's finding that the appellant was not engaged by the State Roadways Transport Corporation.
Whether there is any reason for the High Court to interfere in a question of fact.
Budhram Khatana
The Chief Manager, Rsrtc
Akil Kureshi
Uma Shanker Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
