M/S. Arms Art v. Bank of Baroda
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn by the petitioner, with liberty to move appropriate representation before the bank authorities.
What did the court decide?
Liberty granted to move appropriate representation before the bank authorities.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8041/2021
M/s. Arms Art, Through Its Proprietor Shri Virendra Kumar Lohar S/o Shri Gopi Lal Lohar, Aged 50 Yrs, Residing Near Sitamata Mandir, Sisarma, Udaipur (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
- Bank Of Baroda, Through Its Chief Manager And Authorised Officer, Market Yard, Udaipur (Raj.).
- Branch Manager, Bank Of Baroda, Gordhan Vilas Branch, Sector 14, Udaipur (Raj.).
- Reserve Bank Of India, Through Its Deputy Governor, Central Office Building, Shahid Bhagat Singh Marg, Mumbai 400001
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Paramveer Singh (through VC) For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M/s. Arms Art, Through Its Proprietor Shri Virendra Kumar Lohar
- respondent
Bank Of Baroda
- respondent
Reserve Bank Of India
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CW/8041/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court