Dismissed
Amanteeka v. Omprakash
Rajasthan HCCW/777/2019
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioners submitted that writ petitions became infructuous due to subsequent events. The court dismissed the writ petitions and disposed of the stay petition.
What did the court decide?
Dismissal of writ petitions as infructuous; disposal of stay petition.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
¶2
JODHPUR
¶3
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18364/2019
¶4
- Omprakash S/o Late Maluram, Aged About 56 Years, By Caste Jat, R/o Mamerakhurd, Tehsil Elanabad, Presently Sirsa, District Sirsa (Haryana).
¶5
- Jagdish S/o Late Maluram, Aged About 52 Years, By Caste Jat, R/o Mamerakhurd
¶6
- Indrapal S/o Late Maluram, Aged About 50 Years, By Caste Jat, R/o Mamerakhurd
¶7
- Madanlal, S/o Late Maluram, By Caste Jat, R/o Mamerakhurd, Tehsil Elanabad, District Sirsa, Through Lrs-
¶8
- Gomti Devi W/o Late Madanlal, Aged About 52 Years, By Caste Jat, R/o Mamerakhurd, Tehsil Elanabad, District Sirsa.
¶9
- Anil Kumar S/o Late Madanlal, Aged About 27 Years, By Caste Jat, R/o Mamerakhurd, Tehsil Elanabad, District Sirsa.
¶10
- Sumit Kumar S/o Late Madanlal, Aged About 27 Years, By Caste Jat, R/o Mamerakhurd, Tehsil Elanabad, District Sirsa.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Omprakash S/o Late Maluram
- petitioner
Jagdish S/o Late Maluram
- petitioner
Indrapal S/o Late Maluram
- petitioner
Madanlal S/o Late Maluram
- petitioner
Gomti Devi W/o Late Madanlal
- petitioner
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- CW/777/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court