Disposed

Rahmat Tullah Mehar v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC18 Jun 2021CW/6736/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Jodhpur disposed of the writ petition by directing the respondents to consider the petitioners' representation for posting to vacant nearby posts within four weeks upon filing of fresh representation with prescribed details.

What did the court decide?

Orders petitioners to file fresh representation indicating vacant posts within four weeks; directs authorities to decide representation within four weeks of receipt without mandating a specific outcom

Rahmat Tullah Mehar Vs State of Rajasthan — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6736/2021

¶3

Rahmat Tullah Mehar S/o Hazi Gafur Khan Mehar, Aged About 53 Years, By Caste Muslim, Resident Of Village Post Ramdevra, Tehsil Pokaran, District Jaisalmer (Raj.)

¶4

Bhupendra Kumar Parihar S/o Tamil Ram, Aged About 50 Years, Village Post Dhayasar, Tehsil And District Jaisalmer (Raj.)

¶5

----Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary To The Government, Department Of Education (Gr.ii), Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur

¶8

Director, Secondary Education, Department Of Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Bikaner

¶9

Joint Director (School Education), Jodhpur Division, Jodhpur

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

For Petitioner(s)	:	Mr. Harish Purohit through VC
For Respondent(s)	:	Mr. Vishal Jangid on behalf of
		Mr. Hemant Choudharythrough VC

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESHWAR VYAS (VACATION JUDGE)

¶13

Order

¶14

18/06/2021

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners would be satisfied, if an appropriate direction is issued to the respondents to consider their representation to post them at a nearby place, in accordance with law, where concerned posts are lying vacant.

¶16

The present writ petition is, therefore, disposed of with the direction to the petitioners to address a fresh representation

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

[CW-6736/2021]

¶19

before the competent authority pointing out vacant posts within a period of four weeks alongwith photostat copy of the earlier representation and certified copy of the order instant.

¶20

In case, such representation is filed by the petitioners, the competent authority shall decide the same, in accordance with law, preferably within a period of four weeks from the receipt thereof.

¶21

It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the representation has been issued only with a view to ensure expeditious redressal of petitioners’ grievances. The same may not be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a particular manner.

¶22

The stay applications also stand disposed of accordingly.

¶23

(RAMESHWAR VYAS),VJ

¶24

64-AK Chouhan/-

Rahmat Tullah Mehar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rahmat Tullah Mehar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhagirath Vs State

Kamal Vishnoi Vs State

Anil Manda Vs State of Rajasthan

Balkaran Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramniwas Vs State of Rajasthan

Raju @ Khediya @ Rajendra Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan