In view of respondents counsel submission, the writ petition is held infructuous and dismissed. Stay petition and pending applications also dismissed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1 of 1)
[CW-4830/2015]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4830/2015
Sanjay Sarawat And Ors
----Petitioner
Versus
State And Ors
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikas Balia. For Respondent(s) : Mr. DD Chitlangi. Mr. Anirudh Kothari for Mr. Rajesh Joshi, Sr. Advocate
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
18/11/2021
In wake of second surge in the COVID-19 cases, abundant caution is being maintained, while hearing the matters in Court, for the safety of all concerned.
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the present petition has become infructuous.
Consequently, the present petition is dismissed as having
become infructuous. Stay petition as well as all pending applications also stand dismissed accordingly.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J.
186-Sudheer/-
Sanjay Sarawat
State
PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
