The High Court dismissed connected writ petitions as infructuous after the petitioner's counsel submitted that the cause of action was extinguished.
The writ petitions were dismissed as infructuous and the stay petitions were dismissed accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3297/2013
Tulachha Singh
----Petitioner
Versus
State And Ors.
----Respondent
Connected With
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8454/2012
Heer Dan
----Petitioner
Versus
State Panchayat Raj And Ors
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3298/2013
Asu Singh
----Petitioner
Versus State And Ors. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. K.K. Shah For Respondent(s) : Mr. L.D. Khatri
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
08/12/2021
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petitions have become infructuous.
Consequently, the present petitions are dismissed as having become infructuous. Stay petitions also stand dismissed accordingly.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J.
61-Zeeshan
Tulachha Singh
Heer Dan
Asu Singh
State
Dr. Pushpendra Singh Bhati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
