Allowed

Suresh Kumar v. the Central Board of Secondary Education

Rajasthan HC20 Dec 2021CW/186/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of a writ petition regarding the correction of the petitioner 's name particulars in the C.B.S.E. records. The petitioner was directed to file an application for change of name within three weeks, and C.B.S.E. to consider and decide within eight weeks following the Supreme Court judgment in Jigya Yadav.

What did the court decide?

Directed C.B.S.E. to consider the petitioner's application for name correction and other documents within eight weeks.

Suresh Kumar Vs the Central Board of Secondary… — Education and Admissions | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 186/2020

¶3

Suresh Kumar S/o Gordhan Ram Choudhary, Aged About 17 Years, Minor Through Natural Guardian Father Gordhan Ram Choudhary Son Of Kanwara Ram Choudhary, Aged 53 Years, By Caste Choudhary, Resident Of Plot No. 109, Shiv Vihar Saran Nagar, Jodhpur.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The Central Board Of Secondary Education, Through Its Secretary, Shiksha Kendra- 2, Community Centre, Preet Vihar, Delhi- 110092.

¶7

The Principal, Army Public School, Shankar Vihar, Dehli Cantt- 10.

¶8

The Principal, Army Public School, Near Fol Depot, Ajmer Road, Jodhpur.

¶9

The Section Officer (Certificate Branch), Central Board Of Secondary Education, Regional Office, Todarmal Marg, Ajmer- 305001.

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Himanshu Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. Anil Kumar Khatri

¶12

JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

Order

20/12/2021

I.A. No.1/2021 :

For the reasons stated, the application for early hearing is allowed.

¶17

Matter is taken up for consideration today itself.

¶18

(2 of 2)

¶19

[CW-186/2020]

¶20

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 186/2020

¶21

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment dated 03.06.2021 passed by Hon’ble the Supreme Court in the case of Jigya Yadav (Minor) (Through Guardian/Father Hari Singh) Vs. C.B.S.E. (Cnetral Board of Secondary Education) & Ors. in Civil Appeal No.3905/2011.

¶22

He submits that in light of the judgment of Jigya Yadav (supra) , the respondent – C.B.S.E. is supposed to correct the particulars of petitioner’s name in its record. 3. Mr. Khatri, learned counsel for the respondents is not in a position to dispute the aforesaid position of facts and law. 4. The writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to file application for change/correction in petitioner’s father’s name alongwith all requisite documents as required by Hon’ble the Supreme Court in the judgment of Jigya Yadav (supra).

¶23

In case, application is filed with requisite fees and documents within a period of three weeks from today, the Central Board of Secondary Education shall consider the same in accordance with law, particularly in light of the judgment passed by Hon’ble the Supreme Court rendered in the case of Jigya Yadav (supra) and do the needful within a period of eight weeks of receiving the application.

¶24

The writ petition as well as stay application stand disposed of.

¶25

(DINESH MEHTA),J

¶26

183-Amar/-

Suresh Kumar v. the Central Board of Secondary Education

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suresh Kumar v. the Central Board of Secondary Education

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raji Ram Vs State Co-Op. and Ors.

Bhagwan Lal Vs Gopal Lal and Ors.

Rajudi Vs Saroj Kumari and Anr.

Vidya Para Medical College Vs State of Rajasthan

Shiv Teacher Training College Vs State of Rajasthan

Shri Haridutt S.T.C. College Vs State of Rajasthan