The High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur dismissed connected writ petitions as infructuous because the term of the concerned elected Sarpanch had already expired. Stay applications were also dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1001/2017
Vimla Devi W/o Ajay Saran, B/c Jat, R/o Nagadi, Tehsil Khinvsar, District Nagaur.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
Connected With
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 840/2017
Rajudi W/o Badri Ram, Resident Of Tadawas, Tehsil Khinvsar, District Nagaur
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. I. R. Choudhary |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Kailash Choudhary |
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
17/12/2021
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the term of elected Sarpanch of concerned Gram Pranchayat has already expired and thus, the writ petitions have been rendered infructuous.
Dismissed accordingly.
Stay applications too stand dismissed accordingly.
(DINESH MEHTA),J
59 & 60-A.Arora/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petitions challenging the validity of the election/ori��ent are maintainable given the expiry of the Sarpanch term.
Vimla Devi W/o Ajay Saran
Rajudi W/o Badri Ram
Manju Devi D/o Rugha Ram
Additional Senior Civil Judge, Nagaur
Saroj Kumari W/o Mahadev Ram
DINESH MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
