This order dismisses a writ petition as infructuous because an application filed by the petitioners was allowed on the ground that an earlier order had rendered the suit useless. No substantive judicial reasoning is provided.
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous; the application stating the writ is infructuous is allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12967/2017
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Barkha Gupta for Mr. Ajatshatru Mina For Respondent(s) : Dr. V.B. Sharma, AAG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Order
06/12/2021
The matter comes up on an application stating therein that in view of the order dated 15.05.2019 passed by the respondents, the writ petition is rendered infructuous.
Learned counsel for the petitioners did not dispute the aforesaid position.
In view thereof, the application is allowed.
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J
Manish/36
Dr. Vinay Kumar Sharma
Dr. Abhinav Kamal Raina
State Of Rajasthan
The Commissionrate College Education
The Principal, Government College, Nasirabad
Mahendar Kumar Goyal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
