Allowed

Vinod S/O Shri Daulatram v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC26 Oct 2021CRLMP/6618/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan allowed a criminal miscellaneous petition seeking quashing of FIR no. 347/2021. The court held that as parties were related, the dispute was amicably settled, a cross-FIR existed, and the complainant consented, the petition was permitted and proceedings quashed.

What did the court decide?

Proceedings pending in FIR No. 347/2021 are quashed and stay application is disposed of.

Vinod S/O Shri Daulatram Vs State of Rajasthan — Quashing and FIR | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6618/2021

¶3

Vinod S/o Shri Daulatram, Resident Of Village Khijuriwas, Police Station Bhiwadi, Police District Bhiwadi, District Alwar (Rajasthan).

¶4

Rajkumar S/o Shri Daulatram, Resident Of Village Khijuriwas, Police Station Bhiwadi, Police District Bhiwadi, District Alwar (Rajasthan).

¶5

Samsher S/o Pappu, Resident Of Village Khijuriwas, Police Station Bhiwadi, Police District Bhiwadi, District Alwar (Rajasthan).

¶6

Daulatram S/o Nirbhay, Resident Of Village Khijuriwas, Police Station Bhiwadi, Police District Bhiwadi, District Alwar (Rajasthan).

¶7

Bimla W/o Daulatram, Resident Of Village Khijuriwas, Police Station Bhiwadi, Police District Bhiwadi, District Alwar (Rajasthan).

¶8

Geeta W/o Kanchan, Resident Of Village Khijuriwas, Police Station Bhiwadi, Police District Bhiwadi, District Alwar (Rajasthan).

¶9

Neetu W/o Vinod, Resident Of Village Khijuriwas, Police Station Bhiwadi, Police District Bhiwadi, District Alwar (Rajasthan).

¶10

Kavita W/o Rajkumar, Resident Of Village Khijuriwas, Police Station Bhiwadi, Police District Bhiwadi, District Alwar (Rajasthan).

¶11

----Petitioners

¶12

Versus

¶13

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶14

Ramotar S/o Shri Nirbhay, Resident Of Village Khijuriwas, Police Station Bhiwadi, Police District Bhiwadi, District Alwar (Rajasthan).

¶15

----Respondents

¶16

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prakash Chand Thakuriya For State : Mr. Shyam Prakash Sharma, PP For Complainant(s) : Ms Jamasi

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

[CRLMP-6618/2021]

¶19

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI

¶20

Order

¶21

26/10/2021

¶22

Petitioners have preferred this misc petition seeking quashing of FIR No347/2021 registered at Police Station Bhiwadi(Police District Bhiwadi) District Alwar.

¶23

It is contended by counsel for the petitioners that parties are related to each other. They have amicably settled their dispute. Complainant does not want to proceed further with the FIR lodged by him.

¶24

Complainant respondent No.2 has not disputed the fact of parties having entered into compromise. He does not want to proceed further with the FIR lodged by him and he has no objection to the quashing of FIR.

¶25

I have considered the contentions.

¶26

In view of the fact that parties are related to each other, they have amicably settled their dispute and there is cross-FIR, I deem it proper to allow the misc. petition.

¶27

Hence, the misc. petition is allowed. Proceedings pending in FIR No347/2021 registered at Police Station Bhiwadi(Police District Bhiwadi) District Alwar is quashed.

¶28

Stay application stands disposed.

¶29

(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J

¶30

Heena/151

Vinod S/O Shri Daulatram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vinod S/O Shri Daulatram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Mala Wife of Om Prakash, Vs State of Rajasthan

Ram Avtar Pabdi S/O Ram Kumar Pabdi Vs State

Rinku Choudhary Daughter of Shri Chima Ram, Vs State of Rajasthan

Vijay Kumar Son of Late Shri Munshi Ram Tutlani Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramautar S/O Shri Nirbhay, Vs State of Rajasthan

Balaram Vs State of Raj and Anr.