Petitioner sought quashing of an FIR alleging use of unfair means in an examination. The High Court held that the FIR disclosed a cognizable offence and no negative report was filed, making the petition unentertained. The petition was dismissed.
Criminal Misc. Petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2727/2021
Rinku Choudhary Daughter Of Shri Chima Ram, Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of Village / Post Wada Bhadvi, Tehsil Bagoda, District Jalore (Raj).
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sudhir Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. F.R. Meena, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI
Judgment / Order
25/10/2021
Kerala, 2001 (3) R.C.R. (Criminal) 436.
(2 of 2)
[CRLMP-2727/2021]
discloses the commission of cognizable offence and police after due investigation has come to the conclusion that petitioner is involved in the commission of the offence.
(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J
NIKHIL KR. YADAV /20
1 issue framed by the court
Whether grounds exist to entertain a criminal miscellaneous petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing an FIR wherein a cognizable offence is disclosed and no final negative report is available.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
T.T. Antony V. State of KeralaReferred¶12
T.T. Antony V. State of Kerala, 2001 (3) R.C.R. (Criminal) 436.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rinku Choudhary
State Of Rajasthan
Pankaj Bhandari
Nikhil Kr. Yadav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
