Disposed

Urvi Shrimali v. State

Rajasthan HC28 Oct 2021CRLMP/5906/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This disposal order quashes a petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking protection. The court directed the petitioners to appear before the Superintendent of Police for threat analysis rather than issuing direct police protection, while clarifying the order does not prove marriage age or validity.

What did the court decide?

The petition is disposed of by directing the Superior Police of Banswara to hear the grievance, analyse threat perceptions, and pass necessary orders.

Urvi Shrimali Vs State — Matrimonial and Divorce | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 5906/2021

¶3

Urvi Shrimali W/o Vipin Joshi, D/o Ashok Shrimali, Aged About 26 Years, r/o Khacha Bazar, Mukam Post Khadagda, Khargada, Khadagda, Dungarpur, Rajasthan Presently R/o Ward No. 14, Shilpi Mohalla, Talwada, Banswara (Raj.).

¶4

Vipin Joshi S/o Mahendra Joshi, Aged About 30 Years, Ward No. 14, Shilpi Mohalla, Talwada, Banswara (Raj.).

¶5

----Petitioners Versus

¶6

State, Through Pp

¶7

Superintendent Of Police, Dist. Banswara (Raj.).

¶8

Sho, P.s. Janamedi (Banswara), Dist. Banswara (Raj.).

¶9

Ashok Shrimali S/o Karuna Shankar Shrimali, Village Khadgda, Teh. Sangwada, Dist. Dungarpur (Raj.).

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pappa Ram Kumawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.K. Bhati, PP

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

¶13

Order

¶14

28/10/2021

¶15

The petitioners have preferred this criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of necessary directions to the official respondents to provide adequate security and protection to the petitioners on the ground that they are facing grave threat of life and liberty at the hands of respondent no.4 & their family members, in view of solemnization of their marriage with each other on 23.10.2021.

¶16

After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and on an overall consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case,

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

[CRLMP-5906/2021]

¶19

this Court is of the view that nobody can be permitted to take law in his own hands merely because marriage is not acceptable. Thus, this Court deems it proper to direct the petitioners to appear before the Superintendent of Police, Banswara, who shall hear the grievance of the petitioners and after analysing the threat perceptions, if required so, may pass necessary orders.

¶20

Consequently, the present misc. petition stands disposed of by issuing direction to the Superintendent of Police, Banswara to ensure necessary vigil that no harm is caused to the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of those, who are opposed to the marriage.

¶21

It is made clear that this order is not a proof of age and the marriage of the petitioners and any observations in this order shall not affect any criminal and civil proceedings initiated against the petitioners at the instances of their relatives.

¶22

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J

¶23

10-payal/-

Urvi Shrimali v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Urvi Shrimali v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jayesh Jain Vs State of Rajasthan

Suchita Pokhrana Vs State

Pankaj Mathur Vs State

Khushboo Vs State

Kamla Devi @ Kusum Vs State

Parvindra Kaur Vs State